I see. Thank you for the reply! I think P2P will work well enough for my
current purposes, and I'll try to keep track of updates as new versions come
out.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> > Hi. I posed this question a little while back, but never rece
Hi. I posed this question a little while back, but never received a
response. Is it a bad idea to rely on ZMQ_P2P sockets? You mentioned that
"IIR Auto-Reconnection" is missing. What exactly is "IIR"? Also, is there
any other important functionality missing from these sockets in their
current
o-reconnection is missing.
>
> Try using other socket types.
>
> Martin
>
> jonathan morabito wrote:
> > I'm not quite sure - compiled it in march from trunk, i believe. in
> > usr/local/lib, it is called "libzmq.so.0.0.0". I will grab 2.0.6,
> >
gt;
> What version is that? Doesn't look like 2.0.6 or the trunk.
>
> Martin
>
> jonathan morabito wrote:
> > Hello:
> >
> > I wrote up a simple test app in which i create a context, create a
> > socket of type ZMQ_P2P, bind it to an interface, and then atte
Hello:
I wrote up a simple test app in which i create a context, create a socket of
type ZMQ_P2P, bind it to an interface, and then attempt to call recv
(blocking). When I arrive at the receive, I get:
Assertion failed: false (p2p.cpp:83)
Aborted
Additionally, in my other executable that create
Hello,
I intend to create a fairly complex networking topology using zmq_rep and
zmq_req sockets. I have a couple questions:
1. When using IPC as the transport method, after binding a zmq_rep socket
to an IPC pathname, can I have multiple zmq_req sockets connect to that same
pathname and expect
nerate_time(uuid_t out);
malo
>
> - Original Message -
> From: jonathan morabito
> To: Pavol Malosek
> Cc: Vitaly Mayatsk...
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 10:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] zeromq 2.0b2 compile error...
___
zerom
s/area:download/zeromq-2.0-beta2.tar.gz>
> from
> www.zeromq.org and start from configure (do not run autogen.sh on that
> machine)
>
> malo
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* jonathan morabito
> *To:* Pavol Malosek
> *Cc:* Vitaly Mayatskikh ;
> ze
<http://www.zeromq.org/local--files/area:download/zeromq-2.0-beta2.tar.gz>
from
www.zeromq.org and start from configure (do not run autogen.sh on that
machine)
malo
>
> - Original Message -
> From: jonathan morabito
> To: Pavol Malosek
> Cc: Vitaly Mayatskikh ; zeromq
the sourcefile does not contain any dependencies which is
confusing me.
Other Plo files are containing only #dummy as well?
Did you compile some other software from source on that machine?
malo
>
> - Original Message -
> From: jonathan morabito
> To: Pavol Malosek
>
.deps/libzmq_la-uuid.Plo and have a look which
uuid.h file is listed there.
More, check that file for missing declarations - for me seems like that file
is broken / invalid.
Or post your uuid.h here.
malo
- Original Message -
>
> From: jonathan morabito
> To: Pavol Malosek
&
I attached a file containing the full output of make, but it awaits
moderator approval, since the overall message was larger than 40KB.
On Feb 18, 2010 3:28 PM, "jonathan morabito"
wrote:
Please find the full make output attached to this email. Thanks!
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:13
, jonathan morabito <
jonathan.morab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is attached.
>
> By the way, my i386 version of UUID is NOT the devel version, while the
> 64-bit version IS the devel version. I am linking against the 64-bit, devel
> version. Should I attempt to get the i386 d
system?
>
> Could you please send your src/platform.hpp file?
>
> malo
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* jonathan morabito
> *To:* Pavol Malosek
> *Cc:* Vitaly Mayatskikh ; m...@kotelna.sk ;
> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> *Sent:* Thursday,
in this scope
make[2]: *** [libzmq_la-uuid.lo] Error 1"
Any thoughts?
~Jonathan
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Pavol Malosek wrote:
> Hello
>
> Note that you need libuuid.so link to libuuid.so.1.2 (not libuuid.so.1
> link to libuuid.so.1.2)
> Please check it.
>
Pavol mentioned that I needed both a "libuuid.so.1" symlink to
"libuuid.so.1.2" and "libuuid.a" in my linker path. That is why I asked.
On Feb 18, 2010 2:17 PM, "Vitaly Mayatskikh" wrote:
At Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:12:22 -0500, jonathan morabito wrote
Oh, and one more thing, there is no "libuuid.a" on my system. Where do I
obtain this file?
Cheers,
Jonathan
On Feb 18, 2010 2:08 PM, "jonathan morabito"
wrote:
Alrighty. "sudo ldconfig -v" yields 3 uuid symlinks:
1. "libuuid.so.1 -> libuuid.so.1.2"
Alrighty. "sudo ldconfig -v" yields 3 uuid symlinks:
1. "libuuid.so.1 -> libuuid.so.1.2" in "/lib"
2. "libuuid.so.1 -> libuuid.so.1.2" in "/lib64"
3. "libossp-uuid.so.16 -> libossp-uuid.16.0.21" in "/usr/lib64"
I have both the i386 e2fsprogs-libs and x86_64 versions installed. Is that
a probl
It's attached to this message. Thanks!
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Martin Lucina wrote:
> jonathan.morab...@gmail.com said:
> > Just ran "sudo yum install e2fsprogs-libs", which updated 6 packages
> > successfully. Still getting the same error... "Could not link with
> libuuid,
> > insta
Just ran "sudo yum install e2fsprogs-libs", which updated 6 packages
successfully. Still getting the same error... "Could not link with libuuid,
install develop version"
On Feb 18, 2010 11:10 AM, "Vitaly Mayatskikh" wrote:
At Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:55:14 -0500, jona
dea how to fix this?
Cheers,
Jonathan Morabito
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
21 matches
Mail list logo
