Hi Ghislain,
Thanks for explanation!
> Android is mostly a Linux flavour, which unfortunately still requires a
> non standard toolchain, called the NDK. This toolchain defines the
> ANDROID variable, so I hadn't proposed a ZMQ_HAVE_ANDROID variable.
>
Ok. So AFAIU autotools cannot be used to
Ghislain,
Nice! I've tweaked the page to make it easier for people to find the
downloads, and tweeted about it so the world knows...
-Pieter
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Ghislain PUTOIS wrote:
> Pieter,
>
> Good suggestion,
>
> I've just put my source package on
> http://www.zeromq.org/dis
Pieter,
Good suggestion,
I've just put my source package on
http://www.zeromq.org/distro:android . It contains my source tree for
building dynamic libraries for uuid and (not too old) trunk zmq.
Most of my comments are in the create.sh script.
Don't hesitate to update it with more comments.
--
Ghislain,
I think it's very exciting that 0MQ runs on Android, with these
patches. It would be great if you could create a wiki page on
www.zeromq.org/community, e.g. in http://www.zeromq.org/distro:_start,
for Android. This way people can find your patch more easily.
-Pieter
On Thu, Nov 11, 2
ZMQ on Android is important for me.
Thanks for submitting the patch.
I'll try and take a look at it in the near future for a distributed system
we're extending to mobile devices.
--
Wolf
On Nov 11, 2010, at 4:51 AM, Ghislain PUTOIS wrote:
> On lun., 2010-11-08 at 12:09 +0100, Martin Lucina w
On lun., 2010-11-08 at 12:09 +0100, Martin Lucina wrote:
> sust...@250bpm.com said:
> > Mato,
> > > Indeed, that would be my greatest concern. We can't easily accept patches
> > > which add "Yet another build system", it creates too much of a maintenance
> > > overhead.
> > >
> > I'va asked Ghi
sust...@250bpm.com said:
> Mato,
> > Indeed, that would be my greatest concern. We can't easily accept patches
> > which add "Yet another build system", it creates too much of a maintenance
> > overhead.
> >
> I'va asked Ghislain and the reason is that he's not familiar with
> autotools. Still
Mato,
> Indeed, that would be my greatest concern. We can't easily accept patches
> which add "Yet another build system", it creates too much of a maintenance
> overhead.
>
I'va asked Ghislain and the reason is that he's not familiar with
autotools. Still, the patch is perfectly valid.
So the
Hi,
sust...@250bpm.com said:
> Hi Ghislain,
>
> Great work!
>
> Is there a reason why the build for Android isn't integrated with existing
> autotools build system?
Indeed, that would be my greatest concern. We can't easily accept patches
which add "Yet another build system", it creates too muc
Hi Ghislain,
Great work!
Is there a reason why the build for Android isn't integrated with
existing autotools build system?
Martin
On 11/06/2010 03:39 PM, Ghislain PUTOIS wrote:
Dear all,
Here is a small patch to ease the cross-compilation of the trunk on
the Android platform, which is mo
Dear all,
Here is a small patch to ease the cross-compilation of the trunk on the
Android platform, which is mostly a LINUX platform, except form some missing
POSIX functions.
You can also find a compiled version and a copy of the sources I am
currently using for cross-compiling to Android on
http
11 matches
Mail list logo
