Re: [zeromq-dev] Gentoo Packages

2010-10-02 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
I can help. We can support other languages in one or as a separated ebuilds (e.g. zeromq-python), but we need this as a tarball (not as a source from github). btw. There is some pgm compilation problem with icc compiler. regards, daniel 2010/10/2 Peter Alexander vel.ac...@gmail.com Hi

Re: [zeromq-dev] Gentoo Packages

2010-10-02 Thread Steven McCoy
2010/10/2 Daniel Cegiełka daniel.cegie...@gmail.com btw. There is some pgm compilation problem with icc compiler. ICC is a bit broken, you can work out the diffs here if you really want to build it: http://code.google.com/p/openpgm/source/browse/trunk/openpgm/pgm/SConstruct.097.intelc

Re: [zeromq-dev] Gentoo Packages

2010-10-02 Thread Peter Alexander
Hi Daniel. I spoke to gentoo devs about how bindings should be packaged awhile ago... should it be one zeromq package with use flags for the bindings _or_ separate packages for each binding. They said they prefer separate packages for each binding. ~Peter 2010/10/2 Daniel Cegiełka

Re: [zeromq-dev] Gentoo Packages

2010-10-02 Thread Peter Alexander
Daniel btw, On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Peter Alexander vel.ac...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Daniel. I spoke to gentoo devs about how bindings should be packaged awhile ago... should it be one zeromq package with use flags for the bindings _or_ separate packages for each binding. They said they

Re: [zeromq-dev] Gentoo Packages

2010-10-02 Thread Peter Alexander
Sorry to all for the multitude of posts.. I'm still working on my morning coffee :-P 2010/10/2 Daniel Cegiełka daniel.cegie...@gmail.com: I can help. We can support other languages in one or as a separated ebuilds (e.g. zeromq-python), but we need this as a tarball (not as a source from

Re: [zeromq-dev] Gentoo Packages

2010-10-02 Thread Peter Alexander
2010/10/2 Daniel Cegiełka daniel.cegie...@gmail.com: 2010/10/2 Daniel Cegiełka daniel.cegie...@gmail.com: I can help. We can support other languages in one or as a separated ebuilds (e.g. zeromq-python), but we need this as a tarball (not as a source from github). I don't see

Re: [zeromq-dev] Gentoo Packages

2010-10-02 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
2010/10/2 Peter Alexander vel.ac...@gmail.com 2010/10/2 Daniel Cegiełka daniel.cegie...@gmail.com: 2010/10/2 Daniel Cegiełka daniel.cegie...@gmail.com: I can help. We can support other languages in one or as a separated ebuilds (e.g. zeromq-python), but we need this as a tarball

[zeromq-dev] Gentoo Packages

2010-10-01 Thread Peter Alexander
Hi all. I've noticed that zeromq-2.0.9 has been included recently in the Gentoo Linux package tree, and I just now submitted an ebuild to them for git master (available at [1]). I've noticed that there is no distro page on the wiki as of yet. Is something you'd like to pronounce or maybe not

Re: [zeromq-dev] Gentoo Packages

2010-10-01 Thread Pieter Hintjens
Peter, Thanks for pointing out the broken distro category. I've taken the opportunity to change all the wiki categories and make them easier to work with. I've also improved the left nav menu, which was getting very cluttered. You will find the new distro category under the 'wiki' menu option

Re: [zeromq-dev] Gentoo Packages

2010-10-01 Thread Peter Alexander
Hi Pieter. Yes worked fine. I edited the page very basicly for now, which I'll touch up later. Thank you. On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote: Peter, Thanks for pointing out the broken distro category.  I've taken the opportunity to change all the wiki