Hi again Nicolas,
I finally got around to porting my code from the old cl-zmq to your
lisp-zmq. It is superior in quite a few ways, and is, of course, actively
maintained. There's nothing like an overnight bugfix to an issue to make
users happy. :-)
A major problem with the old cl-zmq is that it
Lucas Hope writes:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> I use cl-zmq for a few projects - I even forked it to do some small
> compatibility changes I needed to upgrade it from 2.0.x compatibility to
> 2.1.x compatibility.
> ( https://github.com/lhope/cl-zmq )
>
> As far as I know, the old author has all-but abandon
Hi Nicolas,
I use cl-zmq for a few projects - I even forked it to do some small
compatibility changes I needed to upgrade it from 2.0.x compatibility to
2.1.x compatibility.
( https://github.com/lhope/cl-zmq )
As far as I know, the old author has all-but abandoned the project.
Is your new bindin
Pieter Hintjens writes:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Nice work. You should add it to the Common Lisp binding page at
> http://www.zeromq.org/bindings:cl and perhaps work with the author of
> the existing binding.
The author of the existing binding is really busy, and (as he told me)
doesn't have the time t
Hi Nicolas,
Nice work. You should add it to the Common Lisp binding page at
http://www.zeromq.org/bindings:cl and perhaps work with the author of
the existing binding.
-Pieter
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Nicolas Martyanoff wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I released a new Common Lisp binding: http://code
Hi,
I released a new Common Lisp binding: http://codemore.org/cl-zmq.html.
The git repository is on Github: https://github.com/galdor/cl-zmq.
It is currently fully functional, and will be improved (particularly for
performances) in the future. Since I use it for a large side-project
(along with
