aha, I see someone finally registered xn--mq-kka.org
Unfortunately the cachet is lost with an ANSI redirect.
--
Steve-o
On 6 April 2010 09:19, Steven McCoy steven.mc...@miru.hk wrote:
Doesn't look like the IDN domain name is taken either, although where would
one register it as Network
It wasn't iMatix, in any case, our registrar couldn't handle the name. I
assume it's a squatter.
-Pieter
On 16 Nov 2010 22:25, Steven McCoy steven.mc...@miru.hk wrote:
aha, I see someone finally registered xn--mq-kka.org
Unfortunately the cachet is lost with an ANSI redirect.
--
Steve-o
On 11/17/2010 08:17 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
It wasn't iMatix, in any case, our registrar couldn't handle the name. I
assume it's a squatter.
Interestingly, it redirects to zeromq.org
Martin
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Hah... I take it back. Can you do a whois on the name? (Don't have that on
my Android yet...)
- Pieter
On 17 Nov 2010 08:19, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
On 11/17/2010 08:17 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
It wasn't iMatix, in any case, our registrar couldn't handle the name. I
assume
On 11/17/2010 08:21 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
Hah... I take it back. Can you do a whois on the name? (Don't have that
on my Android yet...)
Domain ID:D160113145-LROR
Domain Name:XN--MQ-KKA.ORG
Created On:10-Sep-2010 14:40:59 UTC
Last Updated On:10-Nov-2010 03:49:40 UTC
Expiration
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
As zero is not a valid first character for identifiers, the code uses
zmq prefixes rather than 0mq.
* (defvar 0mq hello, world)
0MQ
* 0mq
Would it be useful to rename zmq_* to 0mq_*, or is it too late?
-Pieter
At Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:44:35 +0200, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
Would it be useful to rename zmq_* to 0mq_*, or is it too late?
I see no business reason to do so :)
--
wbr, Vitaly
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Vitaly Mayatskikh wrote:
At Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:44:35 +0200, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
Would it be useful to rename zmq_* to 0mq_*, or is it too late?
I see no business reason to do so :)
I think there's a good reason not to do so. As already mentioned, some
languages (notably C) don't allow
Vitaly Mayatskikh wrote:
At Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:22:54 +0200, Martin Sustrik wrote:
As zero is not a valid first character for identifiers, the code uses
zmq prefixes rather than 0mq.
* (defvar 0mq hello, world)
0MQ
* 0mq
hello, world
Mein Gott!
:)
Looking around, I've seen ØMQ spelled a variety of ways.
ØMQ LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH STROKE, LATIN CAPITAL LETTER M, LATIN CAPITAL
LETTER Q
0MQ DIGIT ZERO, LATIN CAPITAL LETTER M, LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Q
zmq
zeromq
What's the preferred spelling? Are there usage differences between these
Doesn't look like the IDN domain name is taken either, although where would
one register it as Network Solutions doesn't seem to take the punycode.
ØMQ.org = xn--mq-kka.org
:-)
Still looking for anyone using IDN, not in Hong Kong or Taiwan for sure even
though HKDNR will sell you a IDN domain.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Michael Glaesemann g...@seespotcode.net wrote:
Looking around, I've seen ØMQ spelled a variety of ways.
ØMQ LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH STROKE, LATIN CAPITAL LETTER M, LATIN
CAPITAL LETTER Q
0MQ DIGIT ZERO, LATIN CAPITAL LETTER M, LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Q
12 matches
Mail list logo
