On 11 June 2013 10:29, Chinmay Nerurkar wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation. We need to have multiple publishers (publishing
> to one multicast channel) on the same host. As a follow-up to Marten's
> question, would the following design be an optimal solution to the problem?
>
> -A single ZMQ prox
Marten Feldtmann schrievkrom.de> writes:
>
> On 10.06.2013 22:23, Steven McCoy wrote:
>
> >
> > It is impossible to have multiple reliable publishers on the same host -
> > they cannot both receive NAK unicast messages.
> >
> > Unlike the consumption side the publish side needs broker design at
On 11 June 2013 01:15, Marten Feldtmann wrote:
> you mean: "impossible .same host", when the applications have the
> same network parameters ?
>
Correct,
> To make a reliable publisher one of the following parameters should be
> different: network adapter, network port, multicast group ?
On 10.06.2013 22:23, Steven McCoy wrote:
>
> It is impossible to have multiple reliable publishers on the same host -
> they cannot both receive NAK unicast messages.
>
> Unlike the consumption side the publish side needs broker design attention.
you mean: "impossible .same host", when the ap
On 10 June 2013 15:56, Ian Barber wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Parag Patel wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the info Steven. In your email previous to this, you
>> provided a preferred solution. Would this work if there are multiple
>> processes that want to send on the same pgm + ipc cha
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Parag Patel wrote:
> Thanks for the info Steven. In your email previous to this, you
> provided a preferred solution. Would this work if there are multiple
> processes that want to send on the same pgm + ipc channel?
>
PGM in ZMQ is for single-publisher scenari
Steven McCoy
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 12:29 PM
To: ZeroMQ development list
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] What is the exact issue with enabling MULTICAST_LOOP
on ZMQ sockets?
On 10 June 2013 11:37, Parag Patel
mailto:parag.pa...@fusionts.com>> wrote:
Does multicast loopback work without
On 10 June 2013 11:37, Parag Patel wrote:
> Does multicast loopback work without known issues on linux (regardless
> of java or not)?
>
>
>
If you start the subscriber before the publisher it relies on undefined
behaviour but works. The subscriber would thus see unicast packets and the
IP
] What is the exact issue with enabling MULTICAST_LOOP
on ZMQ sockets?
On 8 June 2013 08:00, Pieter Hintjens mailto:p...@imatix.com>>
wrote:
If anyone really wants the MULTICAST_LOOP functionality, we can add it
back and try to make the documentation and defaults clear...
I can make thing
On 8 June 2013 08:00, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> If anyone really wants the MULTICAST_LOOP functionality, we can add it
> back and try to make the documentation and defaults clear...
>
>
I can make things even more complicated that if both publisher and
subscriber are Java applications then it will
If anyone really wants the MULTICAST_LOOP functionality, we can add it
back and try to make the documentation and defaults clear...
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Marten Feldtmann
wrote:
> Yes, but now we have to answer theses questions and actually all answers
> are not the way that they are c
Yes, but now we have to answer theses questions and actually all answers
are not the way that they are clear in a sense, that programmers might
know, what that means in real live.
As I understand the situation:
- the reason are mainly due to the Windows platform
- it is not allowed to have a m
If you use MULTICAST_LOOP, you break PGM reliability (Steve explains
why in that email).
The feature was removed to stop people using it and then asking why
PGM wasn't working.
-Pieter
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Chinmay Nerurkar
wrote:
> We are building a system using ZeroMQ 3.2.3 which w
We are building a system using ZeroMQ 3.2.3 which will have processes
publishing/subscribing on/to multicast channels using PGM (epgm). We would
ideally like to have the capability to let a process subscribe to a multicast
group where the publishing process resides on the same host. This capabil
14 matches
Mail list logo
