This is awesome news... :-)
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Steven McCoy wrote:
> On 1 October 2013 17:00, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
>>
>> - JeroMQ does not support pgm:// or epgm:// since OpenPGM has no Java
>> version
>
>
> Technically there is now, just not complete and requires JDK 7.
>
> http
On 1 October 2013 17:00, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> - JeroMQ does not support pgm:// or epgm:// since OpenPGM has no Java
> version
>
Technically there is now, just not complete and requires JDK 7.
https://github.com/steve-o/javapgm
___
zeromq-dev maili
You may want to add this to the FAQ or somewhere on the wiki:
- the two stacks are comparable in performance but it depends on
message size and frequency
- the two stacks are identical at the API and protocol level, and
fully interchangeable
- JeroMQ matches ZeroMQ stable 3.2 whereas JZMQ may soon
Actually, the question in subj.
Q1: What are compeling reasons one should know so that they could turn
him into JeroMQ?
Q2: What's true about JeroMQ:
- better supported?
- community more responsive?
- community has quicker turnaround (in terms of features)?
- battle tested (has prod deployments)?
