Min - just a quick follow up on this. I had a little spare time today
(don't tell anyone) so I put together a single socket to single socket
poller / no poller test in C with libzmq.
The ratio was almost the same as pyzmq - I had ~ 1.37 million messages a
second with the poller, and ~ 4.7 million
Min - I merged the poll request on my little laptop and gave it a spin.
Before your pull request:
mps: 28066
mps: 28116
mps: 29745
mps: 28912
mps: 28679
after your pull request:
mps: 78138
mps: 78364
mps: 78411
mps: 78065
mps: 78175
Excellent.
By the way, just for fun I imported zmq.green inst
Thanks! The 4x degradation is within an acceptable range for what we're
doing and will allow me to keep some things in python for awhile longer.
I'll patch locally and take it for a test drive today.
Brian
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:09 PM, MinRK wrote:
> From my tests this evening, it looks l
>From my tests this evening, it looks like zmq_poll does have an appreciable
cost (plus the overhead of being wrapped in Python), and will be notably
slower than a simple `while True: s.recv()`. But I did find some
inefficiencies in the Poller implementation, which should be addressed by PR
#381 <
Thanks Min - additionally if I'm incorrect in my assumption that the poll
look in my example code should perform better, or if there's a better way
to do what I'm doing just let me know.
The example code polls only one socket (which isn't that useful, hah) but I
wanted to keep the test case dirt s
Thanks for the report, I will look into whether I have introduced a performance
degradation in the last few iterations.
-MinRK
On Jun 24, 2013, at 11:27, Brian Knox wrote:
> It's been awhile since I've used pyzmq, and I'm running into a performance
> issue using Poller.poll().
>
> With a si
It's been awhile since I've used pyzmq, and I'm running into a performance
issue using Poller.poll().
With a simple blocking recv() in a while True loop, I get ~ 300k messages a
second.
With the simplest case of the same code using a poll on the socket, I get ~
30k messages a second.
(pyzeromq)t
