On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo i...@aliax.net wrote:
I'll make a worked example for the Guide, it'll take me a couple of days.
Hi Pieter, any new about it? is it planned for some specific date? :)
The code isn't finished but here is a design sketch:
Hey Benjamin,
Thanks for this pointer, but I'd already done it the old way, clone
and wipe the old repository. I guess I could backtrack now but more
than likely I'll make a mess of it. :-)
-Pieter
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:15 PM, MinRK benjami...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want that to be the
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Delaney Gillilan
delaneygilli...@gmail.com wrote:
Just starting out with pyzmq and zeromq in general. So far the guides been
really helpful. There is no example of how to hook up a REQ/XREP connection
using polling. I'm sure its something simple. I've
Hi Delaney,
So, if 0MQ asserts or crashes when passed an invalid message on the
wire, we consider this a bug. Since you have a nice test case, could
you report this to the 0MQ issue tracker, and post your code to a gist
(gits.github.com)?
-Pieter
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Pieter
Hi all,
Two small news items.
1, we're going to organize a 0MQ conference early next year. Details
to come later.
2, we're launching a competition to find as many ways to crash 0MQ as
possible by sending it invalid messages. Winner gets a free trip to
the conference.
Details on
Hi all,
Here's a patch to master that should prevent zmq_poll exiting when
specified timeout is not yet reached.
Testing and reporting problems is welcome!
Martin
From 9d1306d6bbee66ad2285d164a37df2f6d1dde741 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com
Date: Wed, 13 Oct
sust...@moloch.sk said:
Hi Oleg,
I try to build last git in MSVC 2005 but compiler not found __rdtsc ()
fucntion. I make changes in clock.cpp and send patch file.
b
Two issues:
1. I believe _MSC_VER should be used instead of ZMQ_HAVE_WINDOWS to keep
the MinGW build OK. (Not sure about
p...@imatix.com said:
You're hitting an issue that most 0MQ users come to sooner or later.
0MQ sockets do not, currently, do any kind of heartbeating over TCP
though this is something I'm pretty sure they eventually will need to
do.
The solution is fairly simple, add heartbeating to
Martin,
sust...@moloch.sk said:
Here's a patch to master that should prevent zmq_poll exiting when
specified timeout is not yet reached.
Looks good. I've not actually tested the code, just read it. Suggest you do
the select() implementation also.
If I read this correctly the semantics
Hi guys,
I may also attend; will see how things work out next week.
-mato
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
I rewrite patch file and add Signed-Off-By tag. Sorry if I do
something wrong - I newbie here.
--
Oleg Sevostyanov
JID: boo...@jabber.ru
From 89eeb3af58b4095e47c68c84a4b569fd6a6858dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleg Sevostyanov oleg@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:18:18 +0400
You can do it well after the fact. We only did it last week. All it does
is change how it's viewed on GitHub, but it's nicer for the main repo to not
say 'forked from ...'.
-MinRK
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 02:52, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
Hey Benjamin,
Thanks for this pointer,
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Martin Lucina m...@kotelna.sk wrote:
In Marcelo's specific case he will need to add it into other traffic;
adding an extra socket won't help since his network will still declare the
normal idle connection dead, so the hearbeat (or in this case keepalive)
needs
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo i...@aliax.net wrote:
2010/10/13 Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com:
The code isn't finished but here is a design sketch:
http://github.com/imatix/zguide/blob/master/articles/reliability.md
Hi, as I can read in that page the element doing the
It seems the zmq_poll can now wait infinitely long when timeout is 0.
- Martin
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Martin Sustrik sust...@moloch.sk wrote:
Hi all,
Here's a patch to master that should prevent zmq_poll exiting when specified
timeout is not yet reached.
Testing and reporting
2010/10/13 Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com:
Hi, as I can read in that page the element doing the failover is a
queue rather than the client itself, am I right? Does it mean that a
single client (REQ socket) couldn't not use this failover feature by
itself?
Sure it could, it just needs to
Martin Martin,
Thanks for comments! Here's try no.2
Martin
From e2167cecaefec6557c7a5712fb75e51487ff69a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:39:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Precise timouts in zmq_poll implemented
Signed-off-by: Martin
I noticed this hadn't been done yet...
You can't be idealistic in this world and not be crazy. Because they've
created such a deep structure now, you can't get in. And we don't want to
get in, we're on the outside. But we're not on the outside looking in, we're
on the outside looking out. So I
Thanks, I've added it to the collection!
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Dogen Punk dogenp...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this hadn't been done yet...
You can't be idealistic in this world and not be crazy. Because they've
created such a deep structure now, you can't get in. And we don't
Martin, any reason to postpone the initialization of the end variable?
- mh
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Martin Sustrik sust...@moloch.sk wrote:
Martin Martin,
Thanks for comments! Here's try no.2
Martin
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
Yeah, makes sense.
- mh
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Martin Sustrik sust...@moloch.sk wrote:
On 10/13/2010 10:11 PM, Martin Hurton wrote:
Martin, any reason to postpone the initialization of the end variable?
It's an attempt to lower the latency. If there's already an event to return
Hi Guys,
I've updated stack_context.py and zmqstream.py to incorporate recent
changes from Tornado.
http://github.com/zeromq/pyzmq/pull/38
In addition to fixing some other bugs we found in Tornado, this
appears to fix the issue where close() was hanging. I didn't undo the
DelayedCallback logic
Recently upgraded from an earlier 2.x (2.0.7 I think) to 2.1.0. I
immediately ran into an unusual problem under Linux where my unit test
module passed all tests but then failed to terminate.
The test unit keeps getting stuck with this backtrace, apparently in the
destructor for a static
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 at 5:13 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Martin Lucina m...@kotelna.sk wrote:
In Marcelo's specific case he will need to add it into other traffic;
adding an extra socket won't help since his network will still declare
the
Ack on your points. KeepAlive / Heartbeating belongs in the tcp://
transport layer, doing this at the application level does not appear
to be the best approach. But it's the workaround for now. You can
make it work better by only sending heartbeats when there is no other
data to send, i.e. when
25 matches
Mail list logo
