http://business-standard.com/common/storypage.php?autono=283688&leftnm=5&subLeft=0&chkFlg=


LUNCH WITH BS: Ramachandra Guha

Serial historian

Bhupesh Bhandari / New Delhi May 08, 2007

~
Twenty books under his belt, the author discusses the high and low
points of post-Independence India, the subject of his latest epic
project.

Ramachandra Guha doesn't mind being called a serial historian, having
written extensively on subjects like cricket, environment, tribes and
now the post-Independence national history. His first book, The Unquiet
Woods: Ecological Change and Peasant Resistance in the Himalaya, was
published in 1989. The latest, India After Gandhi: The History of the
World's Largest Democracy, has just come out. In between, there were
another 18 books that he either edited or wrote. And he has another four
or five book ideas in his mind, writes Bhupesh Bhandari.

Guha considers five of these 20 works of true scholarship, though all
his books have won critical acclaim. At least in his case, William
Dalrymple's charge that Indian's are lazy historians doesn't stick. Guha
dismisses Dalrymple's observation as nothing more than a pre-launch
gimmick for his book, The Last Mughal. "What is more important is that
historians should not let their political affiliations impact their
work," he says. About his own political leanings, Guha says he is a
"liberal constitutionalist," though he admits being a little "left of
centre".

We are sitting in The Big Chill restaurant at Khan Market in south
Delhi. The sun outside is scorching. Guha has ordered a pineapple and
pomegranate juice for himself and I am on orange juice. It is an
unlikely place to meet a historian. The Italian eatery is immensely
popular with the young crowd, the music is loud and the space a little
cramped. But Guha was very clear when I had called him for this meeting:
"The place I would like to meet you is The Big Chill."

Guha is a trained sociologist, having studied the discipline at the
Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta. His book on early cricket in
India, A Corner of a Foreign Field: The Indian History of a British
Sport, brings out vividly all the confrontations that were played out in
the country before Independence: between the British rulers and their
Indian subjects, the different religious groups and castes of India. The
central character of the book is Baloo Palwankar, a prodigious spinner
of the ball, who could never captain the Indian side because he was a
Dalit, though he was the most popular Indian cricketer of his time.

Later, when reformist leaders like Mahatma Gandhi came to the forefront
of the national movement, his younger brother, Vithal, did get to lead
the team. "The Palwankars were the first Dalit family of cricket.
Strangely, there has been no Dalit representation in the national team
after them," says Guha.

Guha says he decided to write the book (he depended largely on old
newspapers for information) after he learnt that Palwankar played a key
role in the Poona Pact between Mahatma Gandhi and Babasaheb Ambedkar. In
his early days, Ambedkar had idolised Palwankar for his achievements on
the cricket field. But the two had divergent political views. Led by the
Mahatma, Palwankar thought the caste system could be reformed from
within by appealing to the piety and good sense of the higher castes.
Ambedkar's views on it were far more radical. In fact, the Congress had
put up Palwankar against Ambedkar during the 1937 elections but he lost
to the rising Dalit leader.

Guha chose to focus on Palwankar because he has a soft corner for
spinners—he was a spinner himself in his younger days. "Normally, it is
the batsmen who walk away with all the glory," he says. In the current
crop, his favourite is Stuart McGill. "He could have done a lot more had
Shane Warne not been there," he adds.

Though A Corner of a Foreign Field got excellent reviews from all
around, Guha expects his latest book to sell more. "There isn't much of
a readership for cricket books in the country," he says. With India
After Gandhi, Guha has moved from "niche" history to the broader stream.

In India After Gandhi, Guha says the biggest achievement of modern India
has been the reorganisation of the states on a linguistic basis.
"Otherwise, there would have been Balkanisation. Look at what happened
to Pakistan (when Bengali-speaking East Pakistan became Bangladesh in
1971) or what is happening in Sri Lanka."

Guha says that for Nehru and the other leaders of that time, the idea of
a state was similar to that of Europe—one nation, one language. But
there were violent protests in several states against the idea. At the
end, this is what saved the country from regional conflicts and strife,
he adds.

For the record, Guha himself is a Tamil from Bangalore. The Bengali
sounding surname he got while in school at Dehradun. As his father's
name was Subramaniam Ramdas Guha, he should have been Subramaniam
Ramachandra. But his teachers were not familiar with Tamil name-keeping
norms and that is how he came to be called Ramachandra Guha. He lives in
Bangalore with his wife, Sujatha Keshavan of the design firm
Ray+Keshavan, and two children. "I have no inputs for her work, though
sometimes I run my drafts through her," he says.

Guha orders a tomato garlic risotto for lunch. I settle for Ceasar Salad
and pasta with tuna. The riveting conversation with Guha has drowned the
music and the chatter at the other tables.

"Has democracy strengthened or weakened in India during the last 57
years," I ask him. Guha says that in three aspects, democracy has gained
strength: the representation of Dalits in ministries, high voter
participation amongst women and the backward castes and the growing role
of civil society. But what worries is him is the growing nexus between
bureaucrats and politicians, which has undermined the independence of
the executive, and the conversion of political parties into family
firms.

"It wasn't Nehru but Indira Gandhi who started the dynastic rule in the
Congress. In Nehru's time, he couldn't appoint the chief minister of a
state. There were proper elections at the state level to decide the
leader. It was only after Indira Gandhi came to head the Congress that
there were no elections in the party," he says, adding: "Except for the
two extremes, the Left parties and the BJP, we now see dynastic rule in
all parties like the DMK, the Shiv Sena, the Rashtriya Janata Dal and
the Samajwadi Party."

Guha likes to call India an unnatural state and an unlikely democracy on
account of its linguistic and cultural differences. I remind him of
Amartya Sen's argument that the age-old Indian tradition of arguing
makes India fertile territory for democracy to flourish. "I don't agree.
Indians were not always argumentative. This is not a tradition that goes
back to the days of Ashoka and Akbar. It was only during the freedom
struggle that nationalist leaders started debating on what do with the
social issues that faced the country. In a sense, Raja Ram Mohan Roy was
the first argumentative Indian."

Talking of differences, I remind Guha of his spat with Arundhati Roy
that played out in 2000 and 2001. Guha had faulted her passionate appeal
to scrap the Sardar Sarovar project and had advised her to stick to
writing fiction. He had, in fact, called her the Arun Shourie of the
Left. Not to be left behind, Roy had let out a broadside, calling Guha a
cricket statistician. Guha says he has moved on but adds: "Writers
shouldn't allow themselves to be blackmailed by activists who appeal to
your middle-class consciousness."

The meal is over. Guha does not want dessert and asks for pomegranate
juice. On our way out, down a staircase full of people waiting for a
table, I ask Guha what made him choose this restaurant. "The food is
good and the place is run by Tibetans from Dehradun," he says. We shake
hands and go our separate ways.


--
Subscribe to ZESTCaste by sending a BLANK email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you 
have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to