On Friday 02 June 2006 05:12, Neil Perrin wrote:
> I believe RW_LOCK_HELD checks it's not held by the calling thread only.
> Note, a thread should not doubly read lock the same lock as
> a write lock from another thread between the 2 would deadlock.
Ok, that makes sense. Thanks :)
I'm assuming RW
Hi,
I think I found a bug in the rw_enter() implementation (emulation?) in
libzpool, file /usr/src/lib/libzpool/common/kernel.c:
void
rw_enter(krwlock_t *rwlp, krw_t rw)
{
ASSERT(!RW_LOCK_HELD(rwlp));
ASSERT(rwlp->rw_owner != (void *)-1UL);
ASSERT(rwlp->rw_owner != curthr
