Matthew Ahrens wrote:
> Darren J Moffat wrote:
>> Matthew Ahrens wrote:
>>> Darren J Moffat wrote:
My initial thought was using *dsl_dataset_phys_t* however that
doesn't have sufficient space so it may be better to store a
"pointer" there to some external object.
>>>
>>> Yep, I wou
Matthew Ahrens wrote:
> Darren J Moffat wrote:
>> My initial thought was using *dsl_dataset_phys_t* however that doesn't
>> have sufficient space so it may be better to store a "pointer" there
>> to some external object.
>
> Yep, I would recommend that you store each key in an object in the MOS,
Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Matthew Ahrens wrote:
>> Darren J Moffat wrote:
>>> My initial thought was using *dsl_dataset_phys_t* however that
>>> doesn't have sufficient space so it may be better to store a
>>> "pointer" there to some external object.
>>
>> Yep, I would recommend that you store eac