We have a zfs pool setup as an iscsi disk attached to an equallogic box. When
we boot the system up we get the following warning.
WARNING: kstat_create('mdi', 0, 'ssd0.t1.iscsi0'): namespace collision
I believe this is regards to the zfs iscsi disks.
This may not be the right forum but I don't
nuel Correia
Lustre Engineering
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Portugal
Phone +351.214134023 / x58723
Mobile +351.912590825
Email Ricardo.M.Correia at Sun.COM
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-code/attachments/20080208/bd
On Feb 08, 2008 18:09 +, Ricardo Correia wrote:
> On Qui, 2008-02-07 at 22:51 -0700, Neil Perrin wrote:
> > I believe when a prototype using 1K dnodes was tested it showed an
> > unacceptable (30%?) hit on some benchmarks. So if can possibly
> > avoid increasing the dnode size (by default) the
On Feb 07, 2008 17:14 +, Ricardo Correia wrote:
> On Qui, 2008-02-07 at 09:44 -0700, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
> > Section 2.2.4
> >
> > Not sure what you mean by storing all xattrs in a single object? Are you
> > saying all of the Lustre attributes would be stored in a single Solaris
> > ext
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Feb 07, 2008 17:14 +, Ricardo Correia wrote:
>> On Qui, 2008-02-07 at 09:44 -0700, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
>>> Section 2.2.4
>>>
>>> Not sure what you mean by storing all xattrs in a single object? Are you
>>> saying all of the Lustre attributes would be stored in a
Ricardo M. Correia wrote:
> On Qui, 2008-02-07 at 22:51 -0700, Neil Perrin wrote:
>> I believe when a prototype using 1K dnodes was tested it showed an
>> unacceptable (30%?) hit on some benchmarks. So if can possibly
>> avoid increasing the dnode size (by default) then we should do so.
>
> Hmm, i
This is pretty startling. I just assumed that something like this would work,
since most people have growing data needs and adding new pools to a stripe
would be a waste of money, space, power, time, etc. I'm glad I read this -
I'll go ahead and buy more hard drives now, though I would rather
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Feb 07, 2008 22:51 -0700, Neil Perrin wrote:
>>> It seems to me that the usefulness of extended attributes is to
>>> efficiently store small amounts of information associated with a file,
>>> and I think these would make more sense to be in the dnode (possibly
>>> m
On Feb 07, 2008 22:51 -0700, Neil Perrin wrote:
> > It seems to me that the usefulness of extended attributes is to
> > efficiently store small amounts of information associated with a file,
> > and I think these would make more sense to be in the dnode (possibly
> > making it 1K by default) or
