This month's FROSUG (Front Range OpenSolaris User Group) meeting is on
Thursday, February 22, 2007. Our presentation is "ZFS as a Root File
System" by Lori Alt. In addition, Jon Bowman will be giving an OpenSolaris
Update, and we will also be doing an InstallFest. So, if you want help
installing a
For background on what this is, see:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=24416#24416
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=25200#25200
=
zfs-discuss 01/16 - 01/31
=
Size of all threads during per
> Would the logic behind ZFS take full advantage of a heavily multicored
> system, such as on the Sun Niagara platform? Would it utilize of the
> 32 concurrent threads for generating its checksums? Has anyone
> compared ZFS on a Sun Tx000, to that of a 2-4 thread x64 machine?
Pete and I are workin
Bill Moloney wrote:
Thanks for the input Darren, but I'm still confused about DNODE
atomicity ... it's difficult to imagine that a change that is made
anyplace in the zpool would require copy operations all the way back
up to the uberblock
This is in fact what happens. However, these changes
> Hello Wade,
>
> Thursday, February 8, 2007, 8:00:40 PM, you wrote:
>
>
>
>
> >>
> >> TW> Am I using send/recv incorrectly or is there something else
> >> going on here that
> >> TW> I am missing?
> >>
> >>
> >> It's a known bug.
> >>
> >> umount and rollback file system on host 2. You should
On Feb 8, 2007, at 10:53 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Trevor,
Thursday, February 8, 2007, 6:23:21 PM, you wrote:
TW> I am seeing what I think is very peculiar behaviour of ZFS
after sending a
TW> full stream to a remote host - the upshot being that I can't
send an
TW> incremental st
Hello Wade,
Thursday, February 8, 2007, 8:00:40 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> TW> Am I using send/recv incorrectly or is there something else
>> going on here that
>> TW> I am missing?
>>
>>
>> It's a known bug.
>>
>> umount and rollback file system on host 2. You should see 0 used space
>> on a snapsh
Hello Kory,
Thursday, February 8, 2007, 12:33:13 AM, you wrote:
KW> I run the ZFS command and get this below. How do you fix a degraded
KW> disk?
KW> zpool replace moodle c1t3d0
KW> invalid vdev specification
KW> use '-f' to override the following errors:
KW> /dev/dsk/c1t3d0s0 is part of acti
>
> TW> Am I using send/recv incorrectly or is there something else
> going on here that
> TW> I am missing?
>
>
> It's a known bug.
>
> umount and rollback file system on host 2. You should see 0 used space
> on a snapshot and then it should work.
Bug ID? Is it related to atime changes?
>
>
Hello Trevor,
Thursday, February 8, 2007, 6:23:21 PM, you wrote:
TW> I am seeing what I think is very peculiar behaviour of ZFS after sending a
TW> full stream to a remote host - the upshot being that I can't send an
TW> incremental stream afterwards.
TW> What I did was this:
TW> host1 is Sola
>Yes but one needs to be able to see that menu in order to select
>the correct item first. A chicken-and-egg situation!
But the console redirection setting in the BIOS should address
that, right?
Casper
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensol
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I thought there were a grub "use ttya" and "use ttyb" line on the DVD?
Yes but one needs to be able to see that menu in order to select
the correct item first. A chicken-and-egg situation!
Not that it matters so much for this case now, as I've hook
>That's how I usually use the console on the X4200. However, that
>arrangement doesn't work when one wants to (re)install Solaris.
>Unless there's a way of telling the installer to use the serial
>console while booting from DVD, rather than using the GUI?
I thought there were a grub "use ttya"
We've gotten a lot of questions lately about when we'll have
an updated version of support for booting from zfs. We
are aiming at a new version of this going in to build 60. New
instructions for setting up this configuration will be
made available at the same time. If build 60 turns out
not t
I am seeing what I think is very peculiar behaviour of ZFS after sending a
full stream to a remote host - the upshot being that I can't send an
incremental stream afterwards.
What I did was this:
host1 is Solaris 10 Update 2 SPARC
host2 is Solaris 10 Update 2 x86
host1 # zfs snapshot work/[E
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Many thanks for answering my question. Hopefully my noisy X4200
> >will be installed in the data centre tomorrow (Thursday); I had
> >a set back today while fighting with the Remote Console feature
> >of ILOM 1.1.1 (i.e., it doesn't work). :-(
>
>
Dave Sneddon wrote:
Can anyone shed any light on whether the actual software side of this can
be achieved? Can I share my entire ZFS pool as a "folder" or "network drive"
so WinXP can read it? Will this be fast enough to read/write to at DV speeds
(25mbit/s)? Once the pool is set up and I have it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe there is a write limit (commonly 10
writes) on CF and
similar storage devices, but I don't know for sure.
Apart from that
I think it's a good idea.
James C. McPherson
As a consequence, the /tmp, /var, and swap could eventually be moved
to the ZFS hard driv
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/08/2007 10:23:19 AM:
> > I believe there is a write limit (commonly 10
> > writes) on CF and
> > similar storage devices, but I don't know for sure.
> > Apart from that
> > I think it's a good idea.
> >
> >
> > James C. McPherson
>
> As a consequence, the /t
> I believe there is a write limit (commonly 10
> writes) on CF and
> similar storage devices, but I don't know for sure.
> Apart from that
> I think it's a good idea.
>
>
> James C. McPherson
As a consequence, the /tmp, /var, and swap could eventually be moved to the ZFS
hard drives to gre
Ivan Buetler wrote:
Jerry, Thank you for your response. See my zonecfg of the named NGZ here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # zonecfg -z named export
create -b
set zonepath=/zpool/zones/named
set autoboot=true
add inherit-pkg-dir
set dir=/lib
end
add inherit-pkg-dir
set dir=/platform
end
add inherit-pkg-d
> In short - make sure your UID on Mac is enough to
> access the files on
> nfs (as it would be if you would try to access those
> files locally).
> Or perhaps you tried from user with uid=0 in which
> case it's mapped to
> nobody user by default.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Robert
Exactly as Rober
Ivan Buetler wrote:
Is this true for OpenSolaris? My experience:
I was trying to upgrade from "SunOS 5.11 snv_28" to "SunOS 5.11 snv_54" where
my NGZ zone roots were set to a zfs mount point like below:
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
zpool 93.8G 40.1G26
>With the CPU overhead imposed in checksum of blocks by ZFS, on a large
>sequential write test, the CPU was heavily loaded in a test that I ran.
>By turning off the checksum, the CPU load was greatly reduced.
>Obviously, this caused a tradeoff in reliability for CPU cycles.
What hardware platform
With the CPU overhead imposed in checksum of blocks by ZFS, on a large
sequential write test, the CPU was heavily loaded in a test that I ran. By
turning off the checksum, the CPU load was greatly reduced. Obviously, this
caused a tradeoff in reliability for CPU cycles.
Would the logic behind Z
Hi All,
I have a problem with Global Zone crashing along with the rest of the zones
when a ZFS partition goes to 100% with the following funny messge (really out
of space..) :-) It didn't leave the lying or joking out of space message
though:-)
Feb 8 10:39:35 ss44bsdvgza01 ^Mpanic[cpu1]/t
OSX *loves* NFS - it's a lot faster than Samba - but
you need a bit of extra work.
You need a user on the other end with the right uid and gid
(assuming you're using NFSv3 - you probably are).
Have a look at :
http://number9.hellooperator.net/articles/2007/01/12/zfs-for-linux-and-osx-and-window
Same problem here after some patching :(((
42GB free in a 4.2TB zpool
We can't upgrade to U3 without planning it.
Is there any way to solve the problem?? remove latest patches?
Our uptime with ZFS is going very low ...
thanks
Gino
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
The setup below works fine for me.
macmini:~ jimb$ mount | grep jimb
ride:/xraid2/home/jimb on /private/var/automount/home/jimb (nosuid, automounted)
macmini:~ jimb$ nidump fstab / | grep jimb
ride:/xraid2/home/jimb /home/jimb nfs rw,nosuid,tcp 0 0
NFS server: Solaris 10 11/06 x86_64 + patches,
>Many thanks for answering my question. Hopefully my noisy X4200
>will be installed in the data centre tomorrow (Thursday); I had
>a set back today while fighting with the Remote Console feature
>of ILOM 1.1.1 (i.e., it doesn't work). :-(
Just ssh into it and use the serial console from within
30 matches
Mail list logo
