On 5/24/07, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adam Leventhal wrote:
> Right now -- as I'm sure you have noticed -- we use the dataset name for
> the alias. To let users explicitly set the alias we could add a new property
> as you suggest or allow other options for the existing shareiscs
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Michael,
Sunday, May 27, 2007, 5:13:39 AM, you wrote:
MB> Does ZFS handle a file system full situation any better than UFS? I had
MB> a ZFS file system run at 100% full for a few days, deleted out the
MB> offending files to bring it back down to 75% full, and now
Hello Richard,
Thursday, May 24, 2007, 6:10:34 PM, you wrote:
RE> Incidentally, thumper field reliability is better than we expected. This
is causing
RE> me to do extra work, because I have to explain why.
I've got some thumpers and there're very reliable.
Even disks aren't failing that much
Hello Grant,
Friday, May 25, 2007, 6:54:04 PM, you wrote:
>> It would also be worthwhile doing something like the
>> following to
>> determine the max throughput the H/W RAID is giving
>> you:
>> # time dd of= if=/dev/zero bs=1048576
>> count=1000
>> or a 2Gbps 6140 with 300GB/10K drives, we get
Hello Michael,
Sunday, May 27, 2007, 5:13:39 AM, you wrote:
MB> Does ZFS handle a file system full situation any better than UFS? I had
MB> a ZFS file system run at 100% full for a few days, deleted out the
MB> offending files to bring it back down to 75% full, and now in certain
MB> directorie
>> What I personally do for ZFS loopback mounts, such as required
>> for /tftpboot/I86PC.Solaris_11 on install server, is making
>> them into auto_direct mounts.
>
>OK - I know this is entirely obvious to you (Casper) - but can you
>provide more detail for those who are not lucky enough to work o
