New on the list, so pardon if I am asking something thats been asked
man y many times. Is there any plan to make it such that you can add a
disk to an already established raid-z and grow that raid-z by the size
of the disk? I know you can expand the zpool in this way - but that
doesn't allow the ex
Pete Bentley wrote:
> A fix would be nice though. And while we're at it, so would multi-
> initiator firewire support along the lines of http://oraclenotes.com/
> dba/RacLinuxFirewire.htm ... That would allow some nice, cheap but
> useful configurations for zfs/sun cluster development.
Good i
Alderman, Sean wrote:
> Does anyone on the list have definitive information on whether ZFS works
> with CLARiiON devices?
>
> bash-3.00# uname -a
> SunOS XXX 5.10 Generic_118833-33 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V245
>
> bash-3.00# powermt display dev=all
> Pseudo name=emcpower0a
> CLARiiON ID=APM
On Jul 4, 2007, at 7:50 AM, Wout Mertens wrote:
>> A data structure view of ZFS is now available:
>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/structures/
>>
>> We've only got one picture up right now (though its a juicy one!),
>> but let us know what you're interested in seeing, and
>> we'll t
This is a great idea. I'd like to add a couple of suggestions:
It might be interesting to focus on compression algorithms which are
optimized for particular workloads and data types, an Oracle database for
example.
It might be worthwhile to have some sort of adaptive compression whereby
ZFS could
Bellow, follows a proposal for a new opensolaris project. Of course,
this is open to change since I just wrote down some ideas I had months
ago, while researching the topic as a graduate student in Computer
Science, and since I'm not an opensolaris/ZFS expert at all. I would
really appreciate any s
> >> Does that mean that paging out dirty mmap pages go to new places and
> >> require metadata updates as well?
> >>
> > Yes.
> Indeed, given that ZFS always writes new places (except for uberblock as
> you noted), then that does make the snapshots easier and accounts for
> there being no e
Thanks, Darren.
I've taken the liberty of reordering my follow-up for clarity. Just to
be clear, I'm not critiquing ZFS, just trying to learn it by pushing at
some of the corner cases of filesystem-system interactions. I'm trying
to figure out the implications of various ZFS features when us
On 5 Jul 2007, at 20:33, Jeff Thompson wrote:
> Pete Bentley wrote:
>> I can't see *any* part of 6560174 on bugs.opensolaris.org, which
>> is somewhat annoying as it was me that filed it.
>
> Does anybody else know why bug reports are disappearing on
> bugs.opensolaris.org?
According to a
Does anyone on the list have definitive information on whether ZFS works
with CLARiiON devices?
bash-3.00# uname -a
SunOS XXX 5.10 Generic_118833-33 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V245
bash-3.00# powermt display dev=all
Pseudo name=emcpower0a
CLARiiON ID=APM00033500540 [XXX]
Logical device ID=
These must be examples of data that was corrupted on some other filesystem?
Bitrot certainly did a number on these.
-Wade
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Pete Bentley wrote:
> I can't see *any* part of 6560174 on bugs.opensolaris.org, which is
> somewhat annoying as it was me that filed it.
Does anybody else know why bug reports are disappearing on bugs.opensolaris.org?
> Fow what it's worth though, ZFS on firewire seems to function reasonabl
Thanks, Will, but for the solution I'm building, I can't predict the
hardware the VM will run on, and I don't want to restrict it to the
limited list in the Processor Check document. So unfortunately I think
I'm stuck running 32-bit Solaris for this one.
So it would be nice to have zfs not hang (o
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Jure Pe�~Mar wrote:
... reformatted ...
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 10:26:20 -0500
Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Or maybe someone knows of cheap SSD storage that
could be used for the ZIL?
If 4G is enough for you, take a look at Gigabyte iRam:
http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/
On 7/5/07, David Goldsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. I'm running S10U3 as 32-bit. I don't know if I can run 64-bit Solaris
> 10 with 32-bit Linux as the host OS. Does anyone know if that will work?
> If so, I'll give it a shot.
ISTR that if you have hardware virtualization (Intel VT, on Core
Hi, all,
Environment: S10U3 running as VMWare Workstation 6 guest; Fedora 7 is
the VMWare host, 1 GB RAM
I'm creating a solution in which I need to be able to save off state on
one host, then restore it on another. I'm using ZFS snapshots with ZFS
receive and it's all working fine, except for som
Hi, Matt,
1. My VMWare host has 4 GB. The VMWare guest (Solaris 10) has 1 GB. I
think that at one point I reset the guest to have 2 GB and ran into the
same problem, but I'm not 100% sure. If you think it's worth trying, I
will.
2. I'm running S10U3 as 32-bit. I don't know if I can run 64-bit Sol
David Goldsmith wrote:
> - Restore the state of the second host to the initial state (using zfs
> rollback -r snapshotname)
> - Run zfs receive for a second time on the second host
>
> Now the second host appears to lock up. I wait half an hour and the zfs
> receive command has not completed. I tr
This system exhibits the symptoms of :
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6495013
Moving to nevada would certainly help as it has many more bug fixes and
performance improvements over S10U3.
--
Prabahar.
?ukasz wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm investigating problem with ZFS ove
Hello,
I'm investigating problem with ZFS over NFS.
The problems started about 2 weeks ago, most nfs threads are hanging in
txg_wait_open.
Sync thread is consuming one processor all the time,
Average spa_sync function times from entry to return is 2 minutes.
I can't use dtrace to examine prob
Hi,
I want to use ZFS on root filesystem (/, /usr, /var, swap...). Is it possible
on SPARC platform?
Thanks and regards,
Rodrigo Nascimento
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://ma
I can't see *any* part of 6560174 on bugs.opensolaris.org, which is somewhat
annoying as it was me that filed it.
Fow what it's worth though, ZFS on firewire seems to function reasonably well
in spite of the transport reject errors I mention in that bug report.
Pete.
Jeff Thompson wrote:
>
George wrote:
> I have set up an iSCSI ZFS target that seems to connect properly from
> the Microsoft Windows initiator in that I can see the volume in MMC
> Disk Management.
>
>
> When I shift over to Mac OS X Tiger with globalSAN iSCSI, I am able to
> set up the Targets with the target name
23 matches
Mail list logo
