David Smith wrote:
> Well, the zfs receive process finally died, and now my zfs list works just
> fine.
>
> If there is a better way to capture what is going on, please let me know
> and I can duplicate the hang.
If you can take a crash dump while it is "hung" and make it available, we can
take
On 7/13/07, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mario Goebbels wrote:
> >> While the original reason for this was swap, I have a sneaky suspicion
> >> that others may wish for this as well, or perhaps something else.
> >> Thoughts? (database folks, jump in :-)
> >
> > Lower overhead stora
Did you take a look at "Solaris ZFS and Vertias Storage Foundation
File System Performance White Paper"??
It's more than just a presentation, but I guess you can extract the
graphs from the paper:
http://www.sun.com/software/whitepapers/solaris10/zfs_veritas.pdf
Rayson
On 7/13/07, Vishal Dhur
> >> While the original reason for this was swap, I have a sneaky suspicion
> >> that others may wish for this as well, or perhaps something else.
> >> Thoughts? (database folks, jump in :-)
> >
> > Lower overhead storage for my QEMU volumes. I figure other filesystems
> > running within a ZVOL
