Re: [zfs-discuss] New zfs pr0n server :)))

2007-09-01 Thread michael
to clarify: i mean the promise sata300 tx4. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] Please help! ZFS crash & burn in SXCE b70!

2007-09-01 Thread Richard Elling
more history (geezing) below... Frank Leers wrote: > MC wrote: >>> Richard, thanks for the pointer to the tests in >>> '/usr/sunvts', as this >>> is the first I have heard of them. They look quite >>> comprehensive. >>> I will give them a trial when I have some free time. >>> Thanks >>> Nigel Smit

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS, XFS, and EXT4 compared

2007-09-01 Thread Osma Ahvenlampi
> Aside from the different kernels and filesystems, I tested internal and > external journal devices and software and hardware RAIDs. Software > RAIDs are "raid-10 near2" with 6 disks on Linux. On Solaris the zpool is > created with three mirrors of two disks each. Hardware RAIDs use the > Arec

Re: [zfs-discuss] Please help! ZFS crash & burn in SXCE b70!

2007-09-01 Thread Mario Goebbels
> Yes, I'm not surprised. I thought it would be a RAM problem. > I always recommend a 'memtest' on any new hardware. > Murphy's law predicts that you only have RAM problems > on PC's that you don't test! Heh, the last ever RAM problems I had was a broken 1MB memory stick on that wannabe 486 from C