Re: [zfs-discuss] enterprise scale redundant Solaris 10/ZFS server providing NFSv4/CIFS

2007-09-22 Thread Peter Tribble
On 9/22/07, Paul B. Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, James F. Hranicky wrote: It just seems rather involved, and relatively inefficient to continuously be mounting/unmounting stuff all the time. One of the applications to be deployed against the filesystem will be

[zfs-discuss] Fwd: zoneadm clone doesn't support ZFS snapshots in

2007-09-22 Thread Dick Davies
Bah, wrong list. A timeline would be really nice for when this is likely to be sorted out - higher priority than ZFS root IMO. -- Forwarded message -- From: Dick Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 22 Sep 2007 23:21 Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] zoneadm clone doesn't support ZFS

Re: [zfs-discuss] enterprise scale redundant Solaris 10/ZFS server providing NFSv4/CIFS

2007-09-22 Thread Jonathan Loran
Paul, My gut tells me that you won't have much trouble mounting 50K file systems with ZFS. But who knows until you try. My questions for you is can you lab this out? you could build a commodity server with a ZFS pool on it. Heck it could be a small pool, one disk, and then put your 50K