Hi,
On 09/29/07 22:00, Gavin Maltby wrote:
Hi,
Our zfs nfs build server running snv_73 (pool created back before
zfs integrated to ON) paniced I guess from zfs the first time
and now panics on attempted boot every time as below. Is this
a known issue and, more importantly (2TB of data in the
Hello Neil,
Thursday, September 27, 2007, 11:40:42 PM, you wrote:
NP Roch - PAE wrote:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
I'm CCing zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, as this doesn't look like
FreeBSD-specific problem.
It looks there is a problem with block allocation(?) when we are near
I would like confirm that Solaris Express Developer Edition 09/07
b70, you can't have /usr on a separate zfs filesystem because of
broken dependencies.
1/ Part of the problem is that /sbin/zpool is linked to /usr/lib/
libdiskmgt.so.1
2/ There are probably other broken dependencies since
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 12:57:05PM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Neil,
Thursday, September 27, 2007, 11:40:42 PM, you wrote:
NP Roch - PAE wrote:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
I'm CCing zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, as this doesn't look like
FreeBSD-specific problem.
I would like confirm that Solaris Express Developer Edition 09/07
b70, you can't have /usr on a separate zfs filesystem because of
broken dependencies.
1/ Part of the problem is that /sbin/zpool is linked to
/usr/lib/libdiskmgt.so.1
Yep, in the past this happened on several occasions
Hi all,
I just posted some stuff about a simple ZFS automatic backup service to
my blog:
http://blogs.sun.com/timf/entry/zfs_automatic_backup_0_1
- all thoughts/comments (and bug reports!) welcome
cheers,
tim
--
Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Solaris
T3 comment below...
Gavin Maltby wrote:
Hi,
On 09/29/07 22:00, Gavin Maltby wrote:
Hi,
Our zfs nfs build server running snv_73 (pool created back before
zfs integrated to ON) paniced I guess from zfs the first time
and now panics on attempted boot every time as below. Is this
a known
On 10/01/07 17:01, Richard Elling wrote:
T3 comment below...
[cut]
A scrub is only 20% complete, but has found no errors thus far. I check
the T3 pair and no complaints there either - I did reboot them just for
luck (last reboot was 2 years ago, apparently!).
Living on the edge...
The T3
comment below...
William Papolis wrote:
I checked this out at the Solaris internals link above, because I am also
interested in the best setup for ZFS.
Assuming 500GB drives ...
It turns out that the most cost effective option (meaning the least lost
drive space due to redundancy is to
SCSI based, but solid and cheap enclosures if you don't care about
support:
http://search.ebay.com/search/search.dll?satitle=Sun+D1000
On Oct 1, 2007, at 12:15, Andy Lubel wrote:
I gave up.
The 6120 I just ended up not doing zfs. And for our 6130 since we
don't
have santricity or the
10 matches
Mail list logo