I finally got some new drives for my Ultra 80. I have two 73gig 10K
RPM SCSI disks in it now with 60GB in a ZFS mirror. I am going to be
adding 4x500G SATA disks in a RAIDZ, and I was thinking about using
the "old" zfs space on the SCSI disks for intent logs.
My questions are this:
1) Is it possi
On Aug 25, 2007 8:36 PM, Stuart Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Before I open a new case with Sun, I am wondering if anyone has seen this
> kernel panic before? It happened on an X4500 running Sol10U3 while it was
> receiving incremental snapshot updates.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Aug 25 17:01:50 lda
This kernel panic when running "zfs receive" has been solved with
IDR127787-10. Does anyone know when this large set of ZFS bug fixes
will be released as a normal/official S10 patch?
Thanks.
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 07:36:25PM -0700, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> Before I open a new case with Sun, I
H, well depends on what you are looking for. Is the speed not enough, or
the size of RAM? I am thinking people found out the original GLY would
actually work with a 2-gig DIMM. So it's possible the GLY2 will accept 2-gig
also, which seems plenty for me. YMMV.
This message posted fro
Yeah, I'd seen that, but we're only going to be running 100 users so the boot
time shouldn't be too bad. :-)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinf
Arcea, nice!
Any word on whether 3ware has come around yet? I've been bugging them for
months to do something to get a driver made for solaris.
-Andy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of James C. McPherson
Sent: Thu 11/22/2007 5:06 PM
To: mike
Cc: zfs-discu
Yes it will work, and quite nicely indeed. But you need to be careful.
Currently ZFS mounting is not "instantaneous", if you have like say 3
users, you might be for a rude surprize as system takes its own merry time (~
few hrs) mounting them at next reboot. Even with auto mounter, things won
> SUMMARY:
> 1) Why the difference between pool size and fs
> capacity?
With zfs take df output with a grain of salt -- add more if compression is
turned on.
ZFS being quite complicated, it seems only an "approximate" free space is
reported, which won't be too wrong and would suffice for the pu
Howdy,
Cross-posted to: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
I am playing around with the latest Read-Write ZFS on Leopard and am
confused about why the available size of my admittedly tiny test pool
(100 MB) is showing at ~2/3 (63 MB) of the expected capacity. I used
mkfile to create test "disks". Is t
