Thank you!
we are working on it. new website is coming, as well as next release of
NCP. Meanwhile, old RC1 could be downloaded from:
http://archive.nexenta.org/releases
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 18:01 -0800, MC wrote:
> > 2) Unstable APT integrated with ON build 79, give it a try!
>
> Excellent pro
I'm reading the source code about ZFS trying to know some details about COW
mechanism.
And I've known some related data structures such as dnode_phys_t,
blkptr_t, uberblock_phys_t,objset_phys_t,dnode_t,dmu_buf_impl_t,etc.
but I can't find the codes about allocating a new block, copying
> 2) Unstable APT integrated with ON build 79, give it a try!
Excellent progress!! But your website is out of date and I cannot find a
NexentaCP link on the download page. Only the old NexentaOS link. Also you
should update the news page so it looks like the project is active :)
This mess
Hi All,
This is the road to NCP 1.0...
Our motto:
"""Ubuntu makes best Debian Desktop platform - Nexenta makes best Debian
Server/Storage platform."""
Some latest Nexenta related news:
1) Official Nexenta Core Platform (NCP) repository now is
http://apt.nexenta.org
2) Unstable APT integrated
Eric Schrock wrote:
> What does 'which chmod' show? I think that Indiana chose to have
> /usr/gnu/bin at the head of the path, so you're probably picking up the
> GNU chmod, which doesn't handle NFSv4 ACLs. Manually running
> /usr/bin/chmod should solve your problem.
>
correct for chmod... I c
What does 'which chmod' show? I think that Indiana chose to have
/usr/gnu/bin at the head of the path, so you're probably picking up the
GNU chmod, which doesn't handle NFSv4 ACLs. Manually running
/usr/bin/chmod should solve your problem.
- Eric
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 09:13:25AM -0800, ludo w
> I was just wandering that maybe there's a problem with just one
> disk...
No, this is something I have observed on at least four different systems, with
vastly varying hardware. Probably just the effects of the known problem.
Thanks,
--
/ Peter Schuller
PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schu
Hi,
I am struggling with ZFS/ACL on indiana preview. (ps: I am new to ZFS,
new to indiana, and generally incompetent on Solaris admin commands:-)
First of, I am a bit surprised the 'old' setfacl command does not work
on ZFS:
setfacl -m user:ludo:rw- /etc/apache2/2.2/httpd.conf
File system does
Ross wrote:
> The title says it all really, we'll be creating one big zpool here, with many
> sub filesystems for various systems. Am I right in thinking that we can use
> snapshots of the root filesystem to take a complete backup of everything?
>
This question doesn't really make sense. Bu
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Ross wrote:
> The title says it all really, we'll be creating one big zpool here, with
> many sub filesystems for various systems. Am I right in thinking that
> we can use snapshots of the root filesystem to take a complete backup of
> everything?
I believe what you're lo
The title says it all really, we'll be creating one big zpool here, with many
sub filesystems for various systems. Am I right in thinking that we can use
snapshots of the root filesystem to take a complete backup of everything?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Yes if the underlying NFS share FS is ZFS rather than VxFS... The point
mentioned pertains to ZFS' inability to have the pool enabled from two
different source nodes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Magda
Sent: Tuesday, December 18,
12 matches
Mail list logo
