Hello
running Solaris on x86 and zfs on a hw raid areca arc-1220. (8 * 400G, RAID5
one volume 2.8T)
After a disk failure I replaced the disk and the raid synchronized successfully.
(state of RAID and Volume shows NORMAL)
But the os would'nt boot anymore. (bootloop)
Only solution was removing
It would be interesting to see the output from:
# zdb -v zbk
You can also use zdb to examine the labels on each of the disks.
Each disk had 4 copies of the labels, for redundancy.
Two at the start, and two at the end of each disk.
Use a command similar to this:
# zdb -l /dev/dsk/c2d0p2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
That's a sad situation for backup utilities, by the way - a backup
tool would have no way of finding out that file X on fs A already
existed as file Z on fs B. So what ? If the file got copied, byte by
byte, the same situation exists, the contents are
Hi,
[Sorry for cross-posting, but I think either list can provide the
solution I'm looking for.]
I have been up all night researching zones and ZFS for a particular
project we are going to build soon. It's going to feature the latest
and greatest of OpenSolaris, and use ofcourse ZFS pool to
Bo Granlund wrote:
Hi,
[Sorry for cross-posting, but I think either list can provide the
solution I'm looking for.]
I have been up all night researching zones and ZFS for a particular
project we are going to build soon. It's going to feature the latest
and greatest of OpenSolaris, and
You probably want to share pool/home as an NFS share then mount it in
the zones. The zfs file system itself can't actually be mounted to
multiple mountpoints, its not a shared filesystem like NFS or QFS.
zfs set sharenfs=on pool/home
then in the zones
mount globalzonehost:/home /home
Where
Well, ignore my post, a kernel engineer would know. I had no idea you
could loopback mount the same filesystem into multiple zones, or am I
missing something? This would certainly be more efficient than using nfs.
Lou
James C. McPherson wrote:
Bo Granlund wrote:
Hi,
[Sorry for
Lou Springer wrote:
Well, ignore my post, a kernel engineer would know. I had no idea you
could loopback mount the same filesystem into multiple zones, or am I
missing something? This would certainly be more efficient than using nfs.
Hi Lou,
no need to disparage yourself (at least in
