So, I set utf8only=on and try to create a file with a
filename that is
a byte array that can't be decoded to text using
UTF-8. What's supposed
to happen? Should fopen(), or whatever syscall
'touch' uses, fail?
Should the syscall somehow escape utf8-incompatible
bytes, or maybe
replace
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Cyril Plisko wrote:
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/zfs-discuss/2540-zfs-performance.pdf
Nov 26, 2008 ??? May I borrow your time machine ? ;-)
Are there any stock prices you would like to know about? Perhaps you
are interested in the
S10U4 SPARC on V890 + patches, StorageTek 6140 + CSM200
Generic_127111-09
The same issue, still don't patched ?
If I set NOINUSE_CHECK=1
pool is created succesfully
Regards
--
Piotr (DrFugazi) Tarnowski
This message posted from opensolaris.org
[i]Consider this to be your life's mission.[/i]
Bob, I can do without this.
Richard,
[i]Actually I use several browsers every day. Each
browser has a cache located somewhere in my home
directory and the cache is managed so that it won't
grow very large. With CDP, I would fill my disk in
a week
Alan Perry wrote:
Alan Perry wrote:
I gave a talk on ZFS at a local user group meeting this evening.
What I didn't
know going in was that the meeting was hosted at a Novell consulting
shop. I got
asked a lot of what does ZFS do that NSS doesn't do questions that
I could not
A good handful of people approached me later, being
curious and fascinated by the idea to replace the
backup scheduler with an event-driven creation of the
versions.
Uwe,
I'm still struggling to decide if ADM is what you're looking for. When you
make comments like the one quoted above, I
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Uwe Dippel wrote:
1. The application (NFS - sftp) does not know about the state of writing?
Sometimes applications know about the state of writing and sometimes
they do not. Sometimes they don't even know they are writing.
2. Obviously nobody sees anything in having
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 07:55:45AM -0800, Joe Blount wrote:
* Application aware/driven CDP solves the file sanity challenge by
being explicitly told by the app. But this will have an inherently
limited market because it relies on application support. Basically:
it works, but requires
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 13:43 -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
How was it MVFS could do this without any changes to the shells or any
other programs?
I ClearCase could 'grep FOO /dir1/dir2/file@@/main/*' to see which
version of 'file' added FOO.
(I think @@ was the special hidden key. It might
Bart Smaalders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm unable to find more info about this. E.g., what does reject
file names mean in practice? E.g., if a program tries to create a
file using an utf8-incompatible filename, what happens? Does the
fopen() fail? Would this normally be a problem? E.g.,
On 2/28/08, Christine Tran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Perry wrote:
Alan Perry wrote:
I gave a talk on ZFS at a local user group meeting this evening.
What I didn't
know going in was that the meeting was hosted at a Novell consulting
shop. I got
asked a lot of what does
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 13:43 -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
How was it MVFS could do this without any changes to the shells or any
other programs?
I ClearCase could 'grep FOO /dir1/dir2/file@@/main/*' to see which
version of 'file' added FOO.
(I think @@ was the
So I scrubbed the whole pool and it found a lot more corrupted files.
My condolences :)
General questions and comments about ZFS and data corruption:
I thought RAIDZ would correct data errors automatically with the parity data.
How wrong am I on that? Perhaps a parity correction was
Kyle McDonald wrote:
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 13:43 -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
How was it MVFS could do this without any changes to the shells or any
other programs?
I ClearCase could 'grep FOO /dir1/dir2/file@@/main/*' to see which
version of 'file' added FOO.
Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
Kyle McDonald wrote:
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 13:43 -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
How was it MVFS could do this without any changes to the shells or
any other programs?
I ClearCase could 'grep FOO /dir1/dir2/file@@/main/*' to see which
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
Doing the same as an alternate view on snapshot space would be a
simple matter of programming within ZFS, though the magic token/suffix
to get you into version/snapshot space would likely not be POSIX
compliant..
We already have a POSIX compliant file system for
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Is it possible to create a ZFS pool using a backing file created in
xattr space?
Why would you want to do that ?
I tried but could get it to work with the CLI. However it may be
possible via the (private) libzfs function call interface.
da64-x4500b-gmp03# cd /tmp
Quick question:
If I create a ZFS mirrored pool, will the read performance get a boost?
In other words, will the data/parity be read round robin between the
disks, or do both mirrored sets of data and parity get read off of both
disks? The latter case would have a CPU expense, so I would
On 2/28/08, Alan Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim wrote:
Don't forget, ZFS is open source, and can be ported to any other
number of platforms as well. It's also currently supported on FreeBSD
7.0, and is basically production ready on that platform.
The open source is HUGE in my
Jonathan Loran writes:
Quick question:
If I create a ZFS mirrored pool, will the read performance get a boost?
Yes. I use a stripe of mirrors to get better read and write performance.
Ian.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Le 28 févr. 08 à 20:14, Jonathan Loran a écrit :
Quick question:
If I create a ZFS mirrored pool, will the read performance get a
boost?
In other words, will the data/parity be read round robin between the
disks, or do both mirrored sets of data and parity get read off of
both
Roch Bourbonnais wrote:
Le 28 févr. 08 à 20:14, Jonathan Loran a écrit :
Quick question:
If I create a ZFS mirrored pool, will the read performance get a boost?
In other words, will the data/parity be read round robin between the
disks, or do both mirrored sets of data and parity get
On 2/28/08, Alan Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim wrote:
Don't forget, ZFS is open source, and can be ported to any other
number of platforms as well. It's also currently supported on FreeBSD
7.0, and is basically production ready on that platform.
The open source is HUGE in my
Le 28 févr. 08 à 21:00, Jonathan Loran a écrit :
Roch Bourbonnais wrote:
Le 28 févr. 08 à 20:14, Jonathan Loran a écrit :
Quick question:
If I create a ZFS mirrored pool, will the read performance get a
boost?
In other words, will the data/parity be read round robin between the
Roch Bourbonnais wrote:
Le 28 févr. 08 à 21:00, Jonathan Loran a écrit :
Roch Bourbonnais wrote:
Le 28 févr. 08 à 20:14, Jonathan Loran a écrit :
Quick question:
If I create a ZFS mirrored pool, will the read performance get a
boost?
In other words, will the data/parity be read
Tim wrote:
The greatest hammer in the world will be inferior to a drill when
driving a screw :)
The greatest hammer in the world is a rotary hammer, and it
works quite well for driving screws or digging through degenerate
granite ;-) Need a better analogy.
Here's what I use (quite often) on
Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tim wrote:
The greatest hammer in the world will be inferior to a drill when
driving a screw :)
The greatest hammer in the world is a rotary hammer, and it
works quite well for driving screws or digging through degenerate
granite ;-) Need a
Hm -
Based on this detail from the page:
Change lever for switching between Rotation
+ Hammering , Neutral and Hammering only
I'd hope it could still hammer... Though I'd suspect the size of nails
it would hammer would be somewhat limited... ;)
Nathan.
Boyd Adamson wrote:
Richard Elling
I found this feature to be incredibly useful when managing a Digital Unix
system with AdsFS. Migrating to a larger disk (or larger hardware RAID set)
was a simple add, remove and wait for the filesystem to clean up. This was
done with multiple users online. Good Stuff !
Keep up the good
Boyd Adamson wrote:
Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tim wrote:
The greatest hammer in the world will be inferior to a drill when
driving a screw :)
The greatest hammer in the world is a rotary hammer, and it
works quite well for driving screws or digging through
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
i am a little new to zfs so please excuse my ignorance. i have a poweredge
2950 running Nevada B82 with an Apple Xraid attached over a fiber hba. they
are formatted to JBOD with the pool configured as follows:
. . .
i have a filesystem (tpool4/seplog) shared over
OK, thanks. I still haven't got any answer to my original question,
though. I.e., is there some way to know what text the
filename is, or do I have to make a more or less wild guess what
encoding the program that created the file used?
You have to guess. As far as I know, Apple's HFS (and
Thanks for your reassuring post, loomy :)
I'm pretty sure the reason for all this is some bad hardware..
But I can't get VTS to work, looks like its not supported for this kind of
hardware.
And in order to run some other stresstest software or something I would have to
connect monitor,
33 matches
Mail list logo
