> But each shows a Max_Payload_Size of 128 bytes in both the DevCap and
> DevCtl registers. Clearly they are accepting 256-byte payloads, else I
> wouldn't notice the big perf improvement when reading data from the
> disks.
Right -- you'd see errors instead.
> Could it be possible that (1) an err
On 3/14/08, Vahid Moghaddasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > replace your LUNs one at a time:
> >
> > zpool replace -f rd_01 c4t6006048187870150525244353543d0
> > first_lun_off_dmx-3
> > zpool replace -f rd_01 c4t60
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Elling wrote:
| Well, the other day I found a corrupted file which gave me an
| opportunity to test a little hypothesis on how to recover what
| you can recover. Details are in my blog:
| http://blogs.sun.com/relling/entry/holy_smokes_a_ho
Simple enough thanks. I assume as I start the zpool replace operation, the
original LUNs will not be in rd_01 pool any more.
Not that will do that, but theoretically I can perform this on a live machine
without interruption, is that right?
Thank you,
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 3/14/08, Vahid Moghaddasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply Jim,
> The current pool is consist of a few EMC LUNs and we are moving the entire
> pool to the new EMC storage with different devices.
> What would be my old or new device? Here is some parts of zpool status:
>
> NAM
Thanks for your reply Jim,
The current pool is consist of a few EMC LUNs and we are moving the entire pool
to the new EMC storage with different devices.
What would be my old or new device? Here is some parts of zpool status:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
rd_01 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t60060481878701505
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
> Feel free to open an RFE. It may be a tough sell with PSARC, but maybe
> if we have enough customer requests maybe they can be won over.
Considering how long ZFS has been out, if no one has complained about it
before, it's most likely that (as is of
Vahid,
> We need to move about 1T of data from one zpool on EMC dmx-3000 to
> another storage device (dmx-3). DMX-3 can be visible on the same
> host where dmx-3000 is being used on or from another host.
> What is the best way to transfer the data from dmx-3000 to dmx-3?
> Is it possible to ad
Hi all,
We need to move about 1T of data from one zpool on EMC dmx-3000 to another
storage device (dmx-3). DMX-3 can be visible on the same host where dmx-3000 is
being used on or from another host.
What is the best way to transfer the data from dmx-3000 to dmx-3?
Is it possible to add the new d
Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
>
>> That is not correct. The deny entries are necessary for POSIX semantics.
>> In POSIX are only allowed to pick up permissions from the owner, group or
>> other class. You can't pick up part of the permissions you are lookin
I just wanted to follow up on this issue I raised a few weeks ago.
With help from several of you, I had all the information and tools
I needed to start debugging my problem. Which of course meant that
my problem disappeared!
At one point my theory was that ksh93 was updating my .history file
per
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
> That is not correct. The deny entries are necessary for POSIX semantics.
> In POSIX are only allowed to pick up permissions from the owner, group or
> other class. You can't pick up part of the permissions you are looking
> for from the group class
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Jonathan,
Friday, March 14, 2008, 9:48:47 PM, you wrote:
>
Carson Gaspar wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Bill Shannon wrote:
What's the best way to backup a zfs filesystem to tape, where the size
of the filesystem is la
Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
>
>> this behavior is only possible from a Windows client. When creating
>> files from unix the POSIX rules apply and the requestors mode must be
>> honored, which results in the owner@, group@, and everyone@ entries
>> always b
Hello Jonathan,
Friday, March 14, 2008, 9:48:47 PM, you wrote:
>
Carson Gaspar wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Bill Shannon wrote:
What's the best way to backup a zfs filesystem to tape, where the size
of the filesystem is larger than what can fit on a single
Carson Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Bill Shannon wrote:
> >
> >> What's the best way to backup a zfs filesystem to tape, where the size
> >> of the filesystem is larger than what can fit on a single tape?
> >> ufsdump handles this quite nicel
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Jens Elkner wrote:
> We already lost this functionality with the introduction of the NFSv4
> ACL crap on ZFS and earned a lot of "hate you" feedbacks.
I was actually looking forward to ZFS ACLs, as they should have been much
more compatible with Samba/Windows clients. Unfortu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/14/2008 04:48:47 PM:
>
>
> Carson Gaspar wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Bill Shannon wrote:
>
>
> What's the best way to backup a zfs filesystem to tape, where the size
> of the filesystem is larger than what can fit on a single tape?
> ufsdu
Carson Gaspar wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Bill Shannon wrote:
What's the best way to backup a zfs filesystem to tape, where the size
of the filesystem is larger than what can fit on a single tape?
ufsdump handles this quite nicely. Is there a similar backup pr
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Bill Shannon wrote:
>
>> What's the best way to backup a zfs filesystem to tape, where the size
>> of the filesystem is larger than what can fit on a single tape?
>> ufsdump handles this quite nicely. Is there a similar backup program
>> for zfs? Or
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Bill Shannon wrote:
> What's the best way to backup a zfs filesystem to tape, where the size
> of the filesystem is larger than what can fit on a single tape?
> ufsdump handles this quite nicely. Is there a similar backup program
> for zfs? Or a general tape management progr
What's the best way to backup a zfs filesystem to tape, where the size
of the filesystem is larger than what can fit on a single tape?
ufsdump handles this quite nicely. Is there a similar backup program
for zfs? Or a general tape management program that can take data from
a stream and split it a
Hello Erblichs,
Two years later... :)
It turned out to be a problem with metaslabs fragmentation.
Lowering recordsize to 8k helps slightly but still it's not fixed.
--
Best regards,
Robert Milkowskimailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
Yes! That worked to get the spare back to an available state. Thanks!
So that leaves me with the trying to put together a recommended procedure to
replace a failed lun/disk from our Flexline 380. Does anyone have
configuration in
which they are using a RAID 0 lun, which they need to replace?
David,
Try detaching the spare, like this:
# zpool detach pool-name c10t600A0B80001139967CE145E80D4Dd0
Cindy
David Smith wrote:
> Addtional information:
>
> It looks like perhaps the original drive is in use, and the hot spare is
> assigned but not in use see below about zpool iostat:
>
Addtional information:
It looks like perhaps the original drive is in use, and the hot spare is
assigned but not in use see below about zpool iostat:
raidz22.76T 4.49T 0 0 29.0K 18.4K
c10t600A0B80001139967CF945E80E95d0 - - 0
Jens Elkner wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:33:57AM +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
>> Paul B. Henson wrote:
>>> I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user
>>> home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
>> Why not the in kernel CIFS server ?
>
I would like advise about how to replace a raid 0 lun. The lun is basically a
raid 0 lun which is from a single disk volume group / volume from our Flexline
380 unit. So every disk in the unit is a volume group/volume/lun mapped to the
host. We then let ZFS do the raid.
We have a lun now w
Balaji Kutty wrote:
> Chris Kirby wrote:
>
>>Balaji Kutty wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I want to disable extended attributes in my zfs on s10u4. I found out
>>>that the command to do is zfs set xattr=off . But, I do not
>>>see this option in s10u4.
>>
>>This RFE (6351954) appears to have been integra
I have a a problem with zpool import after having
problems with 2 disks in RAID 5 (hardware raid). There are some bad blocks on
that disks.
#zpool import
..
state: FAULTED
status: The pool metadata is corrupted.
..
#zdb -l /dev/rdsk/c4t600C0FF009258F4855B59001d0s0
is OK.
I managed t
Hi,
I am (hoping) to present a paper at osdevcon in Prague in June. I have
a draft of the paper and
am looking for a couple of people to review it. I am interested to know
the following:
1. Is it understandable?
2. Is it technically correct?
3. Any comments/suggestions to make it better?
The p
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:33:57AM +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Paul B. Henson wrote:
> > I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user
> > home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
>
> Why not the in kernel CIFS server ?
E.g., how would one
Anton B. Rang acm.org> writes:
>
> Be careful of changing the Max_Payload_Size parameter. It needs to match,
> and be supported, between all PCI-E components which might communicate with
> each other. You can tell what values are supported by reading the Device
> Capabilities Register and checkin
33 matches
Mail list logo