> "mp" == Matthew Plumb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
mp> how best to use the disk I have to ensure I have a safe backup
mp> strategy?
continue using rsync between a ZFS pool and an LVM2 pool. At the very
least, have two ZFS pools.
For ZFS over iSCSI, have some zpool-layer redundancy
Yo Josh, when your confidentiality notice is more than 3x longer than your
contribution to a discussion, you need to thump your corporate lawyers.
-- richard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I will be out of the office starting 09/05/2008 and will not return until
> 09/08/2008.
>
> I will respond to y
On Sep 6, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Kaya Bekiroğlu wrote:
> Thanks to Google Shopping I was able to order two of these cards from:
> http://www.printsavings.com/01390371OP-discount-MICRO+MEMORY-MM5425--512MB-NVRAM-battery.aspx
>
> They appear to be in good working order, but unfortunately I am
> unable
I currently use a Linux server w/ 8 disks (approx. 3Tb) as an
NFS/SAMBA/netatalk fileserver. I have a matching Linux server as a backup,
using nightly rsync jobs to keep the backup current. I use LVM, so replacing a
disk is doable, but kind of a pain. Also, I really wanted to use encrypted
disk
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Albert Chin <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:16:15AM -0700, Kaya Bekiroğlu wrote:
> > > The big problem appears to be getting your hands on these cards.
> > > Although I have the drivers now my first supplier let me down, and
> > > while the
I will be out of the office starting 09/05/2008 and will not return until
09/08/2008.
I will respond to your message when I return.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains
information which may be legally confidential and/or privileged and
does not in any case represent a firm
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:16:15AM -0700, Kaya Bekiroğlu wrote:
> > The big problem appears to be getting your hands on these cards.
> > Although I have the drivers now my first supplier let me down, and
> > while the second insists they have shipped the cards it's been three
> > weeks now a
> The big problem appears to be getting your hands on these cards.
> Although I have the drivers now my first supplier let me down, and
> while the second insists they have shipped the cards it's been three
> weeks now and there's no sign of them.
Thanks to Google Shopping I was able to ord
Tim,
> And let this be a lesson to all of you not to write code that is too
> good. If you can't sell an "update" (patch) every 6 months, you'll be
> out of business as well :D
Updates are generally functionality enhancements, which may well be
chargeable; whereas patches are problem-fixes; w
Ross wrote:
> Hey Richard,
>
> I've just seen that somebody else has been caught out by this. Do you think
> it would be worth adding an RFE to add 'send to file' support to ZFS send?
>
No. Pipes are a foundation of UNIX and are much more flexible
than a fixed file interface (as shown below.
Ross wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Well, there haven't been any more comments knocking holes in this idea, so
> I'm wondering now if I should log this as an RFE?
>
go for it!
> Is this something others would find useful?
>
Yes. But remember that this has a very limited scope. Basically
it
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:06 PM, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Johan Hartzenberg writes:
> > I am guessing the answer is YMMV depending on the differences in versions
> > of, for example Firefox, Gnome, Thunderbird, etc, and based on how well
> > these cope with settings that was change
There is an unsupported driver available though, I posted it to the forums a
few months ago:
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=260281
The big problem appears to be getting your hands on these cards. Although I
have the drivers now my first supplier let me down, and while the sec
Paul B. Henson stated:
<
[snip]
<
<
< I tried installing the Sun provided samba source code package to try to do
< some debugging on my own, but it won't even compile, configure fails with:
<
<
< checking for ldap_add_result_entry... no
< configure: error: Active Directory support requires lda
This might be a dumb question, but isn't that going to be a big problem on a
busy pool?
I'm planning to use ZFS as a sync NFS fileserver and I'm expecting a fair bit
of traffic. Does that bug mean ZFS is going to have problems resilvering
failed disks on my system?
--
This message posted from
Hey Richard,
I've just seen that somebody else has been caught out by this. Do you think it
would be worth adding an RFE to add 'send to file' support to ZFS send?
I'll be using data piped to file myself, and while I'm not worried about
corruption myself, if ZFS send knows it's sending to a fi
Hey Miles,
Yes, you remembered right. If the zpool.cache file is there, Solaris will
mount the pool fine on boot with or without the slog. So if you're running a
slog, make sure you keep a backup of that file! I was told that work is being
done to make zpool import work the same way so pools
17 matches
Mail list logo
