I posted the article below in October and I have been waiting for 2008.11
hoping that the update would magically sort out my problem (basically, after a
power cut, my pool imports but one of the datasets doesn't - the other datasets
as well as their contents are visible and seem fully functional
Uwe Dippel wrote:
> Now I modified the slice s0, so that is doesn't overlap with s2 (the whole
> disk) any longer:
>
> Part TagFlag Cylinders SizeBlocks
> 0 rootwm 3 - 10432 159.80GB(10430/0/0) 335115900
> 1 unassignedwm 0
[i]prtvtoc /dev/dsk/c1d0s2 | fmthard -s - /dev/rdsk/c2d0s2[/i]
Tim,
I understand what you try to do here, and had thought of something likewise
myself. But - please see my first post - it is not just a mirror that I want,
the disk is of a different size, and so is the bf-partition. If I simply
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> Now I modified the slice s0, so that is doesn't overlap with s2 (the whole
> disk) any longer:
>
> Part TagFlag Cylinders SizeBlocks
> 0 rootwm 3 - 10432 159.80GB(10430/0/0) 335115900
>
Elaine Ashton wrote:
>> You are sending a full copy of tank/snapshot.
>>
>
> Well, yes, but it wasn't the behaviour I was quite expecting.
>
> I suspect that a 'zfs copy' or somesuch would be a nice utility when wanting
> to shove a parent and all of it's snapshots to another system.
>
>
> You are sending a full copy of tank/snapshot.
Well, yes, but it wasn't the behaviour I was quite expecting.
I suspect that a 'zfs copy' or somesuch would be a nice utility when wanting to
shove a parent and all of it's snapshots to another system.
> If you just want the snapshots, send them
> Carsten wrote:
> I will ask my boss about this (since he is the one
> mentioned in the
> copyright line of smartctl ;)), please stay tuned.
How is this going? I'm very interested too...
Mam
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss
Elaine Ashton wrote:
> I currently have a host that serves as a nominal backup host by receiving
> nightly differential snapshots of datasets/filesystems from a fileserver.
>
> Say that I want to move those snapshots to another system /as they are/ and
> continue to to do nightly snapshots from t
Now I modified the slice s0, so that is doesn't overlap with s2 (the whole
disk) any longer:
Part TagFlag Cylinders SizeBlocks
0 rootwm 3 - 10432 159.80GB(10430/0/0) 335115900
1 unassignedwm 00 (0/0/0)
I currently have a host that serves as a nominal backup host by receiving
nightly differential snapshots of datasets/filesystems from a fileserver.
Say that I want to move those snapshots to another system /as they are/ and
continue to to do nightly snapshots from the fileserver only to a new ho
Hi, I faced with a similar problem, like Ross, but still have not found a
solution. I have raidz out of 9 sata disks connected to internal and 2 external
sata controllers. Bonnie++ gives me the following results:
nexenta,8G,104393,43,159637,30,57855,13,77677,38,56296,7,281.8,1,16,26450,99,+,
Hello,
Im curious on the status on zfs raidz expansion(i.e adding a disk to a
3 disk raidz). I know there was some work done on this feature and i
know there is some demand for it in the home server market.
Thanks.
David
___
zfs-discuss mailing lis
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 06:10:10AM -0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
>
> thanks. All my servers run OpenBSD, so I know the difference between
> a DOS-partition and a slice. :)
My background is Solaris SPARC, where things are simpler. Solaris
writes a label to a physical disk to define slices (Solaris
par
Gary,
thanks. All my servers run OpenBSD, so I know the difference between a
DOS-partition and a slice. :)
My confusion is about the labels. I could not label it what I wanted, like
zfsed or pool, it had to be root. And since we can have only a single
bf-partition per drive (dsk), I was thinkin
This is what I did:
partition> print
Current partition table (original):
Total disk cylinders available: 10442 + 2 (reserved cylinders)
Part TagFlag Cylinders SizeBlocks
0 rootwm 3 - 10441 159.93GB(10439/0/0) 335405070
1 unassignedw
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 03:52:46AM -0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> This might sound sooo simple, but it isn't. I read the ZFS Administration
> Guide and it did not give an answer; at least no simple answer, simple enough
> for me to understand.
> The intention is to follow the thread "Easiest way to r
>>> with my general question about ZFS and RAIDZ I want the following to
>>> know:
>>> Must all harddisks for the storage pool have the same capacity or is
>>> it possible to use harddisks with different capacities?
>>
>> Lowest common denominator applies here. Creating a RAIDZ from a 100GB,
>> 200
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> Thanks, Peter!
>
> (and I really wished the Admin Guide was more practical). So we still do need
> the somewhat arcane format->partition-> tool! I guess, the step that ZFS
> saves is newfs, then?!
If you want to use the whole disk then zfs wi
Thanks, Peter!
(and I really wished the Admin Guide was more practical). So we still do need
the somewhat arcane format->partition-> tool! I guess, the step that ZFS saves
is newfs, then?!
Uwe
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discu
> with my general question about ZFS and RAIDZ I want the following to know:
> Must all harddisks for the storage pool have the same capacity or is it
> possible to use harddisks with different capacities?
Lowest common denominator applies here. Creating a RAIDZ from a 100GB,
200GB and 300GB disk
Hello to the forum,
with my general question about ZFS and RAIDZ I want the following to know:
Must all harddisks for the storage pool have the same capacity or is it
possible to use harddisks with different capacities?
Many thanks for the answers.
Best regards
JueDan
--
This message posted f
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> This might sound sooo simple, but it isn't. I read the ZFS Administration
> Guide and it did not give an answer; at least no simple answer, simple enough
> for me to understand.
> The intention is to follow the thread "Easiest way to replace
This might sound sooo simple, but it isn't. I read the ZFS Administration Guide
and it did not give an answer; at least no simple answer, simple enough for me
to understand.
The intention is to follow the thread "Easiest way to replace a boot disk with
a larger one".
The command given would be
23 matches
Mail list logo
