Re: [zfs-discuss] eon or nexentacore or opensolaris

2009-05-24 Thread Bogdan M. Maryniuk
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Anil Gulecha wrote: > Hi Bogdan, > > Which particular packages were these? RC3 is quite stable, and all > server packages are solid. If you do face issues with a particular > one, we'd appreciate a bug report. All information on this is > helpful.. Well, I don't r

Re: [zfs-discuss] eon or nexentacore or opensolaris

2009-05-24 Thread Anil Gulecha
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Bogdan M. Maryniuk wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Anil Gulecha wrote: >> Hi Bogdan, >> >> Which particular packages were these? RC3 is quite stable, and all >> server packages are solid. If you do face issues with a particular >> one, we'd appreciate a

Re: [zfs-discuss] eon or nexentacore or opensolaris

2009-05-24 Thread Bogdan M. Maryniuk
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Anil Gulecha wrote: > Yes, NCP's Desktop side components (X/Gnome/XFCE) is untested, and > explains the issues. The focus is on the core.. and it has been so > since the move from Gnusolaris (the older Gnome based Nexenta) to > Nexenta Core platform. The idea was a

Re: [zfs-discuss] eon or nexentacore or opensolaris

2009-05-24 Thread dick hoogendijk
On Sun, 24 May 2009 18:24:35 +0900 "Bogdan M. Maryniuk" wrote: > Anyone add StormOS to the distrowatch, please? If so, than you may add OSUNIX too. It seems like a nice new project, not BeneLix has joined the "community" -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D + http://nagual.nl/ | nevad