On 10/11/10 05:13 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Osol b134
I'm experiencing a forced shutdown of a machine.
It is proceeded with a number of beeps in a steady pattern like
beep beep beep beep beep beep
And onward. 2 beeps pause 2 beeps pause... etc.
The beeps are the same ton
Osol b134
I'm experiencing a forced shutdown of a machine.
It is proceeded with a number of beeps in a steady pattern like
beep beep beep beep beep beep
And onward. 2 beeps pause 2 beeps pause... etc.
The beeps are the same tone on each set of beeps but each has
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 09:52:51PM -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
> Are we living in the past?
>
> In the bad old days, UNIX systems spoke NFS and Windows systems spoke
> CIFS. The cost of creating a file system was expensive -- slices,
> partitions, etc.
>
> With ZFS, file systems (datasets) are r
On 10/11/10 05:40 AM, Günther wrote:
on my raidz3 pool one drive failed. on resilvering the hotspare seems to failed also. this ended in
a "insufficient replicas" error with state of hotfix drive "too many errors"
i could bring back the hotfix drive by export/import the pool (hotfix drive is
d
on my raidz3 pool one drive failed. on resilvering the hotspare seems to failed
also. this ended in a "insufficient replicas" error with state of hotfix drive
"too many errors"
i could bring back the hotfix drive by export/import the pool (hotfix drive is
definitely ok) but i could not bring th
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010, Richard Elling wrote:
On Oct 8, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Regardless, nothing beats raidz3 based on computable statistics.
Well, no, not really. It all depends on the number of sets and the MTTR.
Well, ok. I should have appended "except for 3-way mirrors
> From the Linux side, it appears the drive in question
> is either sdb or dm-3, and both appear to be the same
> drive. Since switching to zfs, my Linux-disk-fu has
> become a bit rusty. Is one an alias for the other?
Yes, dm-3 is the alias created by LVM while sdb is the "physical" (or raw)
d
