Had not even noticed the LVD version.
The biggest issue for me is not the form factor but the how hard it would be to
get the client I work for to accept them in the env given support issues.
- Reply message -
From: "Erik Trimble"
Date: Wed, Dec 29, 2010 19:52
Subject: [zfs-discuss] SAS
On 12/29/2010 4:55 PM, Jason Warr wrote:
HyperDrive5 = ACard ANS9010
I have personally been wanting to try one of these for some time as a
ZIL device.
Yes, but do remember these require a half-height 5.25" drive bay, and
you really, really should buy the extra CF card for backup.
Also, s
I do the same with ACARD…
Works well enough.
Fred
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jason Warr
Sent: 星期四, 十二月 30, 2010 8:56
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] SAS/short stroking vs. SSDs for ZIL
HyperDrive
HyperDrive5 = ACard ANS9010
I have personally been wanting to try one of these for some time as a
ZIL device.
On 12/29/2010 06:35 PM, Kevin Walker wrote:
You do seem to misunderstand ZIL.
ZIL is quite simply write cache and using a short stroked rotating
drive is never going to provide a pe
You do seem to misunderstand ZIL.
ZIL is quite simply write cache and using a short stroked rotating drive is
never going to provide a performance increase that is worth talking about
and more importantly ZIL was designed to be used with a RAM/Solid State
Disk.
We use sata2 *HyperDrive5* RAM disk
> From: Bob Friesenhahn [mailto:bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 9:23 PM
>
> > The question of IOPS here is relevant to conversation because of ZIL
> > dedicated log. If you have advanced short-stroking to get the write
latency
> > of a log device down to zero, the
