Re: [zfs-discuss] Very bad ZFS write performance. Ok Read.

2011-02-11 Thread Markus Kovero
I noticed recently that write rate has dropped off and through testing now I am getting 35MB/sec writes. The pool is around 50-60% full. I am getting a CONSTANT 30-35% kernel cpu utilisation, even if the machine is idle. I do not know if this was the case when the write performance was

Re: [zfs-discuss] Very bad ZFS write performance. Ok Read.

2011-02-11 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Markus Kovero I noticed recently that write rate has dropped off and through testing now I am getting 35MB/sec writes. The pool is around 50-60% full. Hi, do you have your zfs prefetch

Re: [zfs-discuss] Very bad ZFS write performance. Ok Read.

2011-02-11 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of ian W Hope you can still help here. Solaris 11 Express. x86 platform E6600 with 6GB of RAM I have a fairly new S11E box Im using as a file server. 3x1.5TB HDD's in a raidz pool. Just so

Re: [zfs-discuss] Very bad ZFS write performance. Ok Read.

2011-02-11 Thread Markus Kovero
On the other hand, that will only matter for reads. And the complaint is writes. Actually, it also affects writes. (due checksum reads?) Yours Markus Kovero ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [zfs-discuss] smbd becomes unresponsive on snv_151a

2011-02-11 Thread Marcis Lielturks
It is integrated with AD who has a lot of domain trusts, lockups happen during working hours, when CIFS is quite busy with a lot of users (~216) and files open(~1723). I don't know about IO load at time when lockup happens, but usually it is not doing heavy IO. time to time is varying - first