From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Donald Stahl
Running a zpool scrub on our production pool is showing a scrub rate
of about 400K/s. (When this pool was first set up we saw rates in the
MB/s range during a scrub).
Wait
On 05/14/11 01:08 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Donald Stahl
Running a zpool scrub on our production pool is showing a scrub rate
of about 400K/s. (When this pool was first set up we saw rates
On May 13, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Donald Stahl d...@blacksun.org wrote:
Running a zpool scrub on our production pool is showing a scrub rate
of about 400K/s. (When this pool was first set up we saw rates in the
MB/s range during a scrub).
The scrub I/O has lower priority than other I/O.
In
The scrub I/O has lower priority than other I/O.
In later ZFS releases, scrub I/O is also throttled. When the throttle
kicks in, the scrub can drop to 5-10 IOPS. This shouldn't be much of
an issue, scrubs do not need to be, and are not intended to be, run
very often -- perhaps once a quarter
On May 9, 2010 at 5:29PM, Richard Elling wrote:
On May 9, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Chris Forgeron wrote:
[..]
Q1 - Doesn't this behavior mean that the L2ARC can never get data objects if
the ARC doesn't hold them?
Yes.
Is setting primary to metadata and secondary to all an impossible request?
