Re: [zfs-discuss] compare snapshot to current zfs fs

2011-06-05 Thread Eric Sproul
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote: Apparently my OS is new enough (b 147 openindiana)... since the command is known.  Very nice...  but where is the documentation? `man zfs' has no hits on a grep for diff (except different..) Ahh never mind... I found:  

Re: [zfs-discuss] compare snapshot to current zfs fs

2011-06-05 Thread Matthew Ahrens
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote: But I also see a massive list of files with a letter `m' prefixed on each line, Which is supposed to mean modified, They cannot all really be modified so I'm thinking its something to do with rsyncing files from a windows

Re: [zfs-discuss] SE11 express Encryption on - errors in the pool after Scrub

2011-06-05 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Hobbes I am testing Solaris Express 11 with napp-it on two machines. In both cases the same problem: Enabling encryption on a folder, filling it with data will result in errors

Re: [zfs-discuss] Metadata (DDT) Cache Bias

2011-06-05 Thread Tim Cook
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Edward Ned Harvey opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote: From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 9:10 PM Instant Poll : Yes/No ? No. Methinks the MRU/MFU balance algorithm adjustment is

Re: [zfs-discuss] Metadata (DDT) Cache Bias

2011-06-05 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:26:20PM -0500, Tim Cook wrote: I'd go with the option of allowing both a weighted and a forced option. I agree though, if you do primarycache=metadata, the system should still attempt to cache userdata if there is additional space remaining. I think I disagree.