Re: [zfs-discuss] Replacement disks for Sun X4500

2011-07-07 Thread Jim Klimov
2011-07-08 2:48, Richard Elling ?: On Jul 7, 2011, at 3:33 PM, nathan wrote: On 7/07/2011 3:12 PM, X4 User wrote: I am bumping this thread because I too have the same question ... can I put modern 3TB disks (hitachi deskstars) into an old x4500 ? X4500 uses the LSI 1068e. I think this ap

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZIL, L2ARC, rpool -- partitions and mirrors oh my!

2011-07-07 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Dave Pooser wrote: My initial thought was mirror the 40GB SSDs for the ZIL and partition the two 64s; mirror two slices for the rpool and two slices for the L2ARC. If there's a smarter way to do it, suggestions gratefully accepted. My current ZFS storage servers are all built

[zfs-discuss] ZIL, L2ARC, rpool -- partitions and mirrors oh my!

2011-07-07 Thread Dave Pooser
Putting together a server for a friend's recording studio. He's planning to do audio editing off the server, so low latency is a big deal. My plan is to create a pool of two 8-drive RAIDZ2 vdevs and then accelerate them... But how? OS if going to be latest OpenIndiana. I have a pair of 40GB SSDs (

Re: [zfs-discuss] Replacement disks for Sun X4500

2011-07-07 Thread Richard Elling
On Jul 7, 2011, at 3:33 PM, nathan wrote: > On 7/07/2011 3:12 PM, X4 User wrote: >> I am bumping this thread because I too have the same question ... can I put >> modern 3TB disks (hitachi deskstars) into an old x4500 ? X4500 uses the LSI 1068e. AFAIK, that HBA does not support disks > 2TB for a

Re: [zfs-discuss] Replacement disks for Sun X4500

2011-07-07 Thread nathan
On 7/07/2011 3:12 PM, X4 User wrote: I am bumping this thread because I too have the same question ... can I put modern 3TB disks (hitachi deskstars) into an old x4500 ? If not, would the x4540 accept them ? I'd expect they would *work* but whether it would be a good idea or not could be deb

Re: [zfs-discuss] Non-Global zone recovery

2011-07-07 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Ram kumar wrote: > > Hi Cindy, > > Thanks for the email. > > We are using Solaris 10 with out Live Upgrade. > > Tested following in the sandbox environment: > > 1)  We have one non-global zone (TestZone)  which is running on Test > zpool (SAN) > > 2)  Don’t

Re: [zfs-discuss] Non-Global zone recovery

2011-07-07 Thread Paul Kraus
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Cindy Swearingen wrote: > I missed that you're using s10 *without* Live Upgrade. > > If so, I don't know what the resulting zone behavior would be. Wouldn't it be the same as just copying (or moving) a zone root without first detaching it ? I have successfully

Re: [zfs-discuss] Non-Global zone recovery

2011-07-07 Thread Cindy Swearingen
I missed that you're using s10 *without* Live Upgrade. If so, I don't know what the resulting zone behavior would be. Cindy On 07/07/11 14:09, Cindy Swearingen wrote: Okay, so which Solaris 10 release is this? It might also depend on how your zones are created. You can review the support zon

Re: [zfs-discuss] Non-Global zone recovery

2011-07-07 Thread Cindy Swearingen
Okay, so which Solaris 10 release is this? It might also depend on how your zones are created. You can review the support zone configurations here: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E18752_01/html/819-5461/ggpdm.html#gigek Using Oracle Solaris Live Upgrade to Migrate or Upgrade a System With

Re: [zfs-discuss] Non-Global zone recovery

2011-07-07 Thread ram . kumar2
It looks like it is looking for SUNWdetached.xml which will create when we deattch the zone but in my case, I didn't deattach the zone before reimage. Thanks, Ram Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -Original Message- From: Ram kumar Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 15:41:17 To: Cindy Swearingen Cc

Re: [zfs-discuss] Non-Global zone recovery

2011-07-07 Thread Ram kumar
Hi Cindy, Thanks for the email. We are using Solaris 10 with out Live Upgrade. Tested following in the sandbox environment: 1) We have one non-global zone (TestZone) which is running on Test zpool (SAN) 2) Don’t see zpool or non-global zone after re-image of Global zone. 3)

Re: [zfs-discuss] Non-Global zone recovery

2011-07-07 Thread Cindy Swearingen
Hi Ram, Which Solaris release is this and how was the OS re-imaged? If this is a recent Solaris 10 release and you used Live Upgrade, then the answer is yes. I'm not so sure about zone behavior in the Oracle Solaris 11 Express release. You should just be able to import testpool and boot your z

Re: [zfs-discuss] Non-Global zone recovery

2011-07-07 Thread Paul Kraus
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Ram wrote: > Can we recover non-global zone if Global zone is reimaged because of an OS > issue > and non-global zone OS is running on different pool which is on SAN. If the NG Zone is on a different zpool, and that zpool was not over-written, then you can easily

Re: [zfs-discuss] What is ZFS metadata in regard to caching and redundant storage policy?

2011-07-07 Thread Steve Gonczi
Hi Jim, Non-metadata is the level zero blocks (leaf blocks) of those zfs objects that store user payload. (plain files, volumes and the like) Everything else is metadata. The place to look is dmu.c. Any object type enumerated in dmu_ot that is flagged "TRUE" is metadata in its entirety,

[zfs-discuss] Non-Global zone recovery

2011-07-07 Thread Ram
Can we recover non-global zone if Global zone is reimaged because of an OS issue and non-global zone OS is running on different pool which is on SAN. For ex: Global is running on rpool -> Internal disk Non-Global zone is running on testpool -> Which is on SAN. Thanks, Ram -- This message posted

[zfs-discuss] What is ZFS metadata in regard to caching and redundant storage policy?

2011-07-07 Thread Jim Klimov
I just found that I do not exactly know: What is ZFS metadata in regard to caching and redundant storage policy? What sort of blocks does it include and what - doesn't? I know that there is some metadata which can be prioritized in ARC with "primarycache" (or in L2ARC with "secondarycache") attri

Re: [zfs-discuss] Replacement disks for Sun X4500

2011-07-07 Thread X4 User
I am bumping this thread because I too have the same question ... can I put modern 3TB disks (hitachi deskstars) into an old x4500 ? If not, would the x4540 accept them ? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-disc