I know there was a thread about this a few months ago.
However, with the costs of SSD's falling like they have, the idea of an Oracle
X4270 M2/Cisco C210 M2/IBM x3650 M3 class of machine with a 13 drive RAIDZ2
zpool (1 hot spare) is really starting to sound alluring to me/us. Especially
with
Hello,
Looks like the mirror was removed or deleted... Can I get it back to it's
original???
Original:
mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Matt Banks wrote:
Am I crazy for putting something like this into production using Solaris 10/11?
On paper, it really seems ideal for our needs.
As long as the drive firmware operates correctly, I don't see a
problem.
Also, maybe I read it wrong, but why is it that
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Matt Banks mattba...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, maybe I read it wrong, but why is it that (in the previous thread about
hw raid and zpools) zpools with large numbers of physical drives (eg 20+)
were frowned upon? I know that ZFS!=WAFL but it's so common in the
On 9/27/2011 10:39 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Matt Banks wrote:
Also, maybe I read it wrong, but why is it that (in the previous
thread about hw raid and zpools) zpools with large numbers of
physical drives (eg 20+) were frowned upon? I know that ZFS!=WAFL
There is no
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Tony MacDoodle
Original:
mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-1 ONLINE
On 27 Sep 2011, at 18:29, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Tony MacDoodle
Now:
mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t3d0 ONLINE
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Matt Banks
Am I crazy for putting something like this into production using Solaris
10/11?
On paper, it really seems ideal for our needs.
Do you have an objection to solaris 10/11 for some
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
When a vdev resilvers, it will read each slab of data, in essentially time
order, which is approximately random disk order, in order to reconstruct the
data that must be written on the
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
The problem basically applies to HDD's. By creating your pool of SSD's,
this problem should be eliminated.
This is not completely true. SSDs will help significantly but they
will still suffer from the synchronized commit of a transaction group.
10 matches
Mail list logo
