[zfs-discuss] Hare receiving snapshots become slower?

2011-09-29 Thread Ian Collins
I have an application that iterates through snapshots sending them to a remote host. With a Solaris 10 receiver, empty snapshots are received in under a second, but with a Solaris 11 Express receiver, empty snapshots are received in 2 to three seconds. This is becoming a real nuisance where

Re: [zfs-discuss] All (pure) SSD pool rehash

2011-09-29 Thread Garrett D'Amore
On Sep 28, 2011, at 8:44 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >> From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com] >> >> Also, the default settings for the resilver throttle are set for HDDs. For > SSDs, >> it is a >> good idea to change the throttle to be more aggressive. > > You mean... > Be mor

Re: [zfs-discuss] All (pure) SSD pool rehash

2011-09-29 Thread Zaeem Arshad
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > > > I think he means, resilver faster. > > SSDs can be driven harder, and have more IOPs so we can hit them harder > with less impact on the overall performance. The reason we throttle at all > is to avoid saturating the bandwidth of the

Re: [zfs-discuss] Hare receiving snapshots become slower?

2011-09-29 Thread Ian Collins
On 09/30/11 05:14 AM, erik wrote: On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:13:56 +1300, Ian Collins wrote: I have an application that iterates through snapshots sending them to a remote host. With a Solaris 10 receiver, empty snapshots are received in under a second, but with a Solaris 11 Express receiver,

Re: [zfs-discuss] Hare receiving snapshots become slower?

2011-09-29 Thread Ian Collins
On 09/30/11 08:03 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, Ian Collins wrote: Slowing down replication is not a good move! Do you prefer pool corruption? ;-) Probably they fixed a dire bug and this is the cost of the fix. Could be. I think I'll raise a support case to find out why.

[zfs-discuss] S10 version question

2011-09-29 Thread Rich Teer
Hi all, Got a quick question: what are the latest zpool and zfs versions supported in Solaris 10 Update 10? TIA, -- Rich Teer, Publisher Vinylphile Magazine www.vinylphilemag.com ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.op

Re: [zfs-discuss] S10 version question

2011-09-29 Thread Ian Collins
On 09/30/11 11:59 AM, Rich Teer wrote: Hi all, Got a quick question: what are the latest zpool and zfs versions supported in Solaris 10 Update 10? In update 10: pool version 29, ZFS version 5. -- Ian. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opens

Re: [zfs-discuss] S10 version question

2011-09-29 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ian Collins > > > Got a quick question: what are the latest zpool and zfs versions > > supported in Solaris 10 Update 10? > > > In update 10: pool version 29, ZFS version 5. I don't know what

Re: [zfs-discuss] S10 version question

2011-09-29 Thread Paul Kraus
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- >> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ian Collins >> >> > Got a quick question: what are the latest zpool and zfs versions >> > supported in Solaris 10 Update 10? >> > >>