Still kicking around this idea and didn't see it addressed in any of the
threads before the forum closed.
If one made an all ssd pool, would a log/cache drive just slow you down? Would
zil slow you down? Thinking rotate MLC drives with sandforce controllers every
few years to avoid losing a
On 10/28/11 07:04 PM, Mark Wolek wrote:
Still kicking around this idea and didn’t see it addressed in any of
the threads before the forum closed.
If one made an all ssd pool, would a log/cache drive just slow you
down? Would zil slow you down?
I would guess not, you would still be
On 10/28/11 00:04, Mark Wolek wrote:
Still kicking around this idea and didnt see it
addressed in any of the threads before the forum closed.
If one made an all ssd pool, would a log/cache
drive just slow you down? Would zil slow you down? Thinking rotate
MLC drives with
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Mark Wolek
Still kicking around this idea and didnt see it addressed in any of the
threads
before the forum closed.
If one made an all ssd pool, would a log/cache drive just slow you
On 10/28/11 00:54, Neil Perrin wrote:
On 10/28/11 00:04, Mark Wolek wrote:
Still kicking around this idea and didnt see
it
addressed in any of the threads before the forum closed.
If one made an all ssd pool, would a log/cache
drive just slow you
Having the log disk slowed it down a lot in your tests (when it wasn't a SSD),
30MB/s vs 7. Is this is also a 100% write / 100% sequential workload? Forcing
sync?
It's gotten to the point where I can buy a 120G SSD for less or the same price
as a 146G SAS disk...Sure the MLC drives have
On 10/28/11 11:21, Mark Wolek wrote:
Having
the log disk slowed it down a lot in your tests (when it wasnt a SSD),
30MB/s vs 7. Is this is also a 100% write / 100% sequential workload?
Forcing sync?
100% synchronous write. Writes are random but ZFS will write them
