Re: [zfs-discuss] Hare receiving snapshots become slower?

2011-11-12 Thread Ian Collins
On 09/30/11 08:12 AM, Ian Collins wrote: On 09/30/11 08:03 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, Ian Collins wrote: Slowing down replication is not a good move! Do you prefer pool corruption? ;-) Probably they fixed a dire bug and this is the cost of the fix. Could be. I think

Re: [zfs-discuss] weird bug with Seagate 3TB USB3 drive

2011-11-12 Thread Richard Elling
On Nov 12, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 08:15:31AM -0500, David Magda wrote: >> On Nov 12, 2011, at 00:55, Richard Elling wrote: >> >>> Better than ? >>> If the disks advertise 512 bytes, the only way around it is with a >>> whitelist. I would >>> be rather

Re: [zfs-discuss] weird bug with Seagate 3TB USB3 drive

2011-11-12 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 08:15:31AM -0500, David Magda wrote: > On Nov 12, 2011, at 00:55, Richard Elling wrote: > > > Better than ? > > If the disks advertise 512 bytes, the only way around it is with a > > whitelist. I would > > be rather surprised if Oracle sells 4KB sector disks for Solaris sy

Re: [zfs-discuss] weird bug with Seagate 3TB USB3 drive

2011-11-12 Thread David Magda
On Nov 12, 2011, at 00:55, Richard Elling wrote: > Better than ? > If the disks advertise 512 bytes, the only way around it is with a whitelist. > I would > be rather surprised if Oracle sells 4KB sector disks for Solaris systems… Solaris 10. OpenSolaris. But would it be surprising to use SANs

Re: [zfs-discuss] weird bug with Seagate 3TB USB3 drive

2011-11-12 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 09:55:29PM -0800, Richard Elling wrote: > On Nov 10, 2011, at 7:47 PM, David Magda wrote: > > > On Nov 10, 2011, at 18:41, Daniel Carosone wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 08:17:55PM -0400, John D Groenveld wrote: > >>> Under both Solaris 10 and Solaris 11x, I recei