Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Appliance as a general-purpose server question

2012-11-22 Thread Robert Milkowski
>So, the only supported (or even possible) way is indeed to us it >as NAS for file or block IO from another head running the database >or application servers?.. Technically speaking you can get access to standard shell and do whatever you want - this would essentially void support contract though

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Appliance as a general-purpose server question

2012-11-22 Thread Ian Collins
On 11/23/12 05:50, Jim Klimov wrote: On 2012-11-22 17:31, Darren J Moffat wrote: Is it possible to use the ZFS Storage appliances in a similar way, and fire up a Solaris zone (or a few) directly on the box for general-purpose software; or to shell-script administrative tasks such as the backup a

Re: [zfs-discuss] Intel DC S3700

2012-11-22 Thread David Magda
On Wed, November 21, 2012 16:06, Jim Klimov wrote: > On 2012-11-21 21:55, Ian Collins wrote: >> I can't help thinking these drives would be overkill for an ARC device. >> All of the expensive controller hardware is geared to boosting random >> write IOPs, which somewhat wasted on a write slowly, re

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Appliance as a general-purpose server question

2012-11-22 Thread Tim Cook
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Jim Klimov wrote: > On 2012-11-22 17:31, Darren J Moffat wrote: > >> Is it possible to use the ZFS Storage appliances in a similar >>> way, and fire up a Solaris zone (or a few) directly on the box >>> for general-purpose software; or to shell-script administrati

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Appliance as a general-purpose server question

2012-11-22 Thread Jim Klimov
On 2012-11-22 17:31, Darren J Moffat wrote: Is it possible to use the ZFS Storage appliances in a similar way, and fire up a Solaris zone (or a few) directly on the box for general-purpose software; or to shell-script administrative tasks such as the backup archive management in the global zone (

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Appliance as a general-purpose server question

2012-11-22 Thread Darren J Moffat
On 11/22/12 16:24, Jim Klimov wrote: A customer is looking to replace or augment their Sun Thumper with a ZFS appliance like 7320. However, the Thumper was used not only as a protocol storage server (home dirs, files, backups over NFS/CIFS/Rsync), but also as a general-purpose server with unpre

[zfs-discuss] ZFS Appliance as a general-purpose server question

2012-11-22 Thread Jim Klimov
A customer is looking to replace or augment their Sun Thumper with a ZFS appliance like 7320. However, the Thumper was used not only as a protocol storage server (home dirs, files, backups over NFS/CIFS/Rsync), but also as a general-purpose server with unpredictably-big-data programs running direc

Re: [zfs-discuss] Woeful performance from an iSCSI pool

2012-11-22 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ian Collins > > I look after a remote server that has two iSCSI pools. The volumes for > each pool are sparse volumes and a while back the target's storage > became full, causing weird and won