Here it is:
# pstack core.format1
core 'core.format1' of 3351: format
- lwp# 1 / thread# 1
0806de73 can_efi_disk_be_expanded (0, 1, 0, ) + 7
08066a0e init_globals (8778708, 0, f416c338, 8068a38) + 4c2
08068a41 c_disk (4, 806f250, 0, 0, 0, 0)
On 13 December, 2012 - Jan Owoc sent me these 1,0K bytes:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:14 AM, sol a...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi
I've just tried to use illumos (151a5) import a pool created on solaris
(11.1) but it failed with an error about the pool being incompatible.
Are we now at
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Fred Liu
BTW, anyone played NDMP in solaris? Or is it feasible to transfer snapshot via
NDMP protocol?
I've heard you could, but I've never done it. Sorry I'm not much help, except
as a
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of sol
I added a 3TB Seagate disk (ST3000DM001) and ran the 'format' command but
it crashed and dumped core.
However the zpool 'create' command managed to create a pool on the whole
disk
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Bob Netherton
At this point, the only thing would be to use 11.1 to create a new pool at
151's
version (-o version=) and top level dataset (-O version=). Recreate the file
system
Hey Sol,
Can you send me the core file, please?
I would like to file a bug for this problem.
Thanks, Cindy
On 12/14/12 02:21, sol wrote:
Here it is:
# pstack core.format1
core 'core.format1' of 3351: format
- lwp# 1 / thread# 1
0806de73
We have found mbuffer to be the fastest solution. Our rates for large
transfers on 10GbE are:
280MB/smbuffer
220MB/srsh
180MB/sHPN-ssh unencrypted
60MB/s standard ssh
The tradeoff mbuffer is a little more complicated to script; rsh is, well,
you know; and hpn-ssh requires
I've heard you could, but I've never done it. Sorry I'm not much help,
except as a cheer leader. You can do it! I think you can! Don't give
up! heheheheh
Please post back whatever you find, or if you have to figure it out for
yourself, then blog about it and post that.
Aha! Gotcha! I
Post in the list.
-Original Message-
From: Fred Liu
Sent: 星期五, 十二月 14, 2012 23:41
To: 'real-men-dont-cl...@gmx.net'
Subject: RE: [zfs-discuss] any more efficient way to transfer snapshot
between two hosts than ssh tunnel?
Hi Fred,
I played with zfs send/reveive some
We have found mbuffer to be the fastest solution. Our rates for large
transfers on 10GbE are:
280MB/smbuffer
220MB/srsh
180MB/sHPN-ssh unencrypted
60MB/s standard ssh
The tradeoff mbuffer is a little more complicated to script; rsh is,
well, you know; and
On Fri, Dec 14 at 9:29, Fred Liu wrote:
We have found mbuffer to be the fastest solution. Our rates for large
transfers on 10GbE are:
280MB/smbuffer
220MB/srsh
180MB/sHPN-ssh unencrypted
60MB/s standard ssh
The tradeoff mbuffer is a little more complicated to script;
On 12/14/12 10:07 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
wrote:
Is that right? You can't use zfs send | zfs receive to send from a newer
version and receive on an older version?
No. You can, with recv, override any property in the sending stream that can be
set from
I have removed all L2arc devices as a precaution. Has anyone seen this
error with no L2arc device configured?
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Jamie Krier wrote:
I am thinking about switching to an Illumos distro,
13 matches
Mail list logo
