On 02/17/2013 06:40 AM, Ian Collins wrote:
Toby Thain wrote:
Signed up, thanks.
The ZFS list has been very high value and I thank everyone whose wisdom
I have enjoyed, especially people like you Sašo, Mr Elling, Mr
Friesenhahn, Mr Harvey, the distinguished Sun and Oracle engineers who
post
From: cindy swearingen [mailto:cindy.swearin...@gmail.com]
This was new news to use too and we're just talking over some options
yesterday
afternoon so please give us a chance to regroup and provide some
alternatives.
This list will be shutdown but we can start a new one on java.net.
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 11:14 AM
I have a few coworkers using it. No horror stories and it's been in use
about 6
months now. If there were any showstoppers I'm sure I'd have heard loud
complaints by now :)
So, I have discovered a *couple* of
hi, i have raid1 on zfs with 2 device on pool
first device died and boot from second not working...
i try to get http://mfsbsd.vx.sk/ flash and load from it with zpool import
http://puu.sh/2402E
when i load zfs.ko and opensolaris.ko i see this message:
Solaris: WARNING: Can't open objset for
On 17 févr. 2013, at 15:15, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 11:14 AM
I have a few coworkers using it. No horror stories and it's been
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
Why would I spend all that time and
energy participating in ANOTHER list controlled by Oracle, when they have
shown they have no qualms about eliminating it with basically 0 warning, at
their whim?
From an open source, community perspective, I
On 2013-02-17 15:46, Konstantin Kuklin wrote:
hi, i have raid1 on zfs with 2 device on pool
first device died and boot from second not working...
You didn't say which OS version created the pool (ultimately -
which pool version is there) and I'm not sure about support of
the zfs versions in
Also, adding to my recent post: instead of resilvering, try to run
zpool scrub first - it should verify all checksums and repair
whatever it can via redundancy (for metadata - extra copies).
Resilver is similar to scrub, but it has its other goals and
implementation, and might be not so
Hmmm, zfs destroy -f zroot/var/crash ?
Then you can try to zfs mount -a
Removing pjd and mm from cc, if they want to read your message they're old
enough to check their ML subscription.
On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:46 PM, Konstantin Kuklin konstantin.kuk...@gmail.com
wrote:
hi, i have raid1 on
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
Why would I spend all that time and
energy participating in ANOTHER list controlled by Oracle, when
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
We can agree to disagree.
I think you're still operating under the auspices of Oracle wanting to have an
open discussion. This is patently false.
I'm just going to respond to this by saying thank you, Cindy, Casper, Neil, and
others, for all the
Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris) wrote:
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
We can agree to disagree.
I think you're still operating under the auspices of Oracle wanting to have an
open discussion. This is patently false.
I'm just going to respond to this by saying
Ian Collins writes:
Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris) wrote:
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
We can agree to disagree.
I think you're still operating under the auspices of Oracle
wanting to have an open discussion. This is patently false.
I'm just going
i can`t do it, because resilvering in progress(freeze on 0.1%) and zfs
list empty
2013/2/17 Fleuriot Damien m...@my.gd:
Hmmm, zfs destroy -f zroot/var/crash ?
Then you can try to zfs mount -a
Removing pjd and mm from cc, if they want to read your message they're old
enough to check their
14 matches
Mail list logo
