[zfs-discuss] multihosted ZFS

2007-01-26 Thread Ari-Pekka Oksavuori
Sun Cluster anyway, but I'd like to know if this can be solved without it. -- Ari-Pekka Oksavuori aoksavuo at cs.tut.fi ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] multihosted ZFS

2007-01-26 Thread Ari-Pekka Oksavuori
James C. McPherson wrote: You can't do it *safely* without the protection of a high- availability framework such as SunCluster. Thanks for the fast reply. :) We'll have look into the Cluster solution. -- Ari-Pekka Oksavuori aoksavuo at cs.tut.fi

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: multihosted ZFS

2007-01-26 Thread Ari-Pekka Oksavuori
from where it was then things definitely will not be pretty... :-) I tested this, same thing with reboot. -- Ari-Pekka Oksavuori aoksavuo at cs.tut.fi ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: multihosted ZFS

2007-01-26 Thread Ari-Pekka Oksavuori
import groups with different id on disk. Would something like this be hard to implement? -- Ari-Pekka Oksavuori aoksavuo at cs.tut.fi ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss