Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS

2011-09-13 Thread Bryan Hodgson
t.php?eid=123170297765140) > -> Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company ( > http://www.sloctheater.org/ ) > -> Technical Advisor, RPI Players > _______ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail

Re: [zfs-discuss] Question regarding incremental zfs send/recv for hundreds of zfs filesystems under one pool

2011-01-24 Thread Bryan Hodgson
And does it handle the deletions as well? Bryan On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:34:57PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote: >On 01/25/11 12:30 PM, Rahul Deb wrote: > > There is only one pool and hundreds of zfs file systems under that > pool. New file systems are getting created on the fly. >

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS vs mpxio vs cfgadm in Solaris.

2010-11-05 Thread Bryan Hodgson
David Magda pointed out (in a note to me) that version is a property that can be set at pool create time, which solves my question concerning upgrading to s10u9 rather handily. Thank you, David. On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:16:18AM -0400, Bryan Hodgson wrote: > > Folks, > > I'm

[zfs-discuss] ZFS vs mpxio vs cfgadm in Solaris.

2010-11-05 Thread Bryan Hodgson
on't think moving to update 9 is an option (yet), nor is OSOL or SXCE. Bottom line: Do ZFS / mpxio / cfgadm issues still make mpxio an iffy proposition as a reliability enhancement? Is there a patch set that addresses ZFS / cfgadm / mpxio issues for s10u7? TIA. Bryan -- Bryan Hodgson L