Hi
Clive King has a nice blog entry showing this in action
http://blogs.sun.com/clive/entry/replication_using_zfs
with associated script at:
http://blogs.sun.com/clive/resource/zfs_repl.ksh
Which I think answers most of your questions.
Enda
Ross wrote:
Hey folks,
Is anybody able to help a
dick hoogendijk wrote:
My server runs S10u5. All slices are UFS. I run a couple of sparse
zones on a seperate slice mounted on /zones.
When S10u6 comes out booting of ZFS will become possible. That is great
news. However, will it be possible to have those zones I run now too?
you can migrate
Dave wrote:
Enda O'Connor wrote:
As for thumpers, once 138053-02 ( marvell88sx driver patch ) releases
within the next two weeks ( assuming no issues found ), then the
thumper platform running s10 updates will be up to date in terms of
marvel88sx driver fixes, which fixes some pretty
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rainer,
Sorry for your trouble.
I'm updating the installboot example in the ZFS Admin Guide with the
-F zfs syntax now. We'll fix the installboot man page as well.
Perhaps it also deserves a mention in the FAQ
Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland) wrote:
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rainer,
Sorry for your trouble.
I'm updating the installboot example in the ZFS Admin Guide with the
-F zfs syntax now. We'll fix the installboot man page
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan,
Just make sure you use dumpadm to point to valid dump device and
this setup should work fine. Please let us know if it doesn't.
The ZFS strategy behind automatically creating separate swap and
dump devices including the following:
o Eliminates the need to
Hi
Use zpool attach
from
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2240/zpool-1m
zpool attach [-f] pool device new_device
Attaches new_device to an existing zpool device. The existing device
cannot be part
of a raidz configuration. If device is not currently part of a mirrored
configuration,
Kenny wrote:
Back to the top
Is there a patch upgrade for ZFS on Solaris 10? Where might I find it.
it's the kernel patch, depending on how far back you are in the update's you
might have to
install m ultiple Kernel Patches.
the latest one is 127127-11/127128-11 ( the u5 KU )
it
Sam Nicholson wrote:
Greetings,
snv_79a
AMD 64x2 in 64 bit kernel mode.
I'm in the middle of migrating a large zfs set from a pair of 1TB mirrors
to a 1.3TB RAIDz.
I decided to use zfs send | zfs receive, so the first order of business
was to snap the entire source filesystem.
# zfs
Richard Elling wrote:
Morris Hooten wrote:
I looked through the solarsinternals zfs best practices and not
completly sure
of the best scenario.
ok, perhaps we should add some clarifications...
I have a Solaris 10 6/06 Generic_125100-10 box with attached 3510 array
and would like to
Mangan wrote:
Is this a release that can be downloaded from the website and will work on
SPARC systems. The write up says it is for VMware. Am I missing something?
Use Solaris 10 9/07. It has more than a year's worth of improvements
and enhancements to Solaris.
-- richard
numbers, 9.07 was what
Richard meant.
Enda
When is the next release for Sparc due out?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dec 21, 2007 9:15 AM
To: Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
David Runyon wrote:
Does anyone know this?
David Runyon
Disk Sales Specialist
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
4040 Palm Drive
Santa Clara, CA 95054 US
Mobile 925 323-1211
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Russ Lai wrote:
Dave;
Does ZFS support Oracle RAC?
Dick Davies wrote:
I had some trouble installing a zone on ZFS with S10u4
(bug in the postgres packages) that went away when I used a
ZVOL-backed UFS filesystem
for the zonepath.
Hi
Out of interest what was the bug.
Enda
I thought I'd push on with the experiment (in the hope Live Upgrade
Paul Armor wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone would know if this is just an accounting-type
error with the recorded version= stored on disk, or if there
are/could-be any deeper issues with an upgraded zpool?
I created a pool under a Sol10_x86_u3 install (11/06?), and zdb correctly
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Enda,
Wednesday, April 11, 2007, 4:21:35 PM, you wrote:
EOCSMSI Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello zfs-discuss,
In order to get IDR126199-01 I need to install 120473-05 first.
I can get 120473-07 but everything more than -05 is marked as
incompatible with
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello zfs-discuss,
In order to get IDR126199-01 I need to install 120473-05 first.
I can get 120473-07 but everything more than -05 is marked as
incompatible with IDR126199-01 so I do not want to force it.
Local Sun's support has problems with getting 120473-05
17 matches
Mail list logo
