On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:53 -0400, Cherry Shu wrote:
Are any plans for an API that would allow ZFS commands including
snapshot/rollback integrated with customer's application?
Sounds like you are looking for abstraction layering on top of
integrated solution such as NexentaStor. Take a look on
James,
also there is this demo:
http://www.nexenta.com/demos/auto-cdp.html
showing how AVS/ZFS integrated in NexentaStor.
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 10:25 -0600, James D. Rogers wrote:
The links to the Part 1 and Part 2 demos on this page
(http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/avs/Demos/) appear
Hi Stephen,
NexentaStor v1.1.5+ could be an alternative, I think. And it includes
new cool COMSTAR integration, i.e. ZFS shareiscsi property actually
implements COMSTAR iSCSI target share functionality not available in
SXCE. http://www.nexenta.com/nexentastor-relnotes
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at
pNFS is NFS-centric of course and it is not yet stable, isn't it? btw,
what is the ETA for pNFS putback?
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 12:20 -0700, Marion Hakanson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It's interesting how the speed and optimisation of these maintenance
activities limit pool size. It's
James, all serious ZFS bug fixes back-ported to b85 as well as marvell
and other sata drivers. Not everything is possible to back-port of
course, but I would say all critical things are there. This includes ZFS
ARC optimization patches, for example.
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 22:33 +1000, James C.
Well, obviously - its Linux vs. OpenSolaris question. Most serious
advantage of OpenSolaris is ZFS and its enterprise level storage stack.
Linux just not there yet..
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:51 +0200, Axel Schmalowsky wrote:
Hallo list,
hope that so can help me on this topic.
I'd like to
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:36 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
A disadvantage, however, is that Sun StorageTek Availability Suite
(AVS), the DRBD equivalent in OpenSolaris, is much less flexible than
DRBD. For example, AVS is intended to replicate in one direction,
from a primary to a secondary,
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 15:00 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:36 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
A disadvantage, however, is that Sun StorageTek Availability Suite
(AVS), the DRBD equivalent in OpenSolaris, is much less flexible than
DRBD. For example, AVS is intended
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 18:37 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 15:00 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:36 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
A disadvantage, however, is that Sun StorageTek Availability Suite
(AVS), the DRBD equivalent in OpenSolaris,
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 19:10 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 18:37 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 15:00 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:36 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
A disadvantage, however, is that Sun StorageTek
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 19:42 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 19:10 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 18:37 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 15:00 -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:36 -0400, Maurice Volaski
Steffen,
Most complete and serious ZFS snapshot management, integrated ZFS
send/recv replication over RSYNC with CLI, integrated AVS, GUI and
management server which provides rich API for C/C++/Perl/Python/Ruby
integrators available here:
http://www.nexenta.com/nexentastor-overview
Its ZFS+
Hey folks,
just saw another cool news this morning - Nexenta Systems released
documentation for remote API and Windows SDK with demos for accessing
NexentaStor. News itself:
http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=154Itemid=56
ZFS and the rest of appliance
Hi folks,
wanted to share some exciting news with you. Pogo Linux shipping
NexentaStor pre-installed boxes, like this one 16TB - 24TB:
http://www.pogolinux.com/quotes/editsys?sys_id=3989
And here is announce:
http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=129Itemid=56
http://blogs.sun.com/constantin/entry/x4500_solaris_zfs_iscsi_perfect
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:44 -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
It would be useful if people here who have used iSCSI on top of ZFS
could share their performance experiences. It is very easy to waste a
lot of time trying to
Take a look on NexentaStor - its a complete 2nd tier solution:
http://www.nexenta.com/products
and AVS is nicely integrated via management RPC interface which is
connecting multiple NexentaStor nodes together and greatly simplifies
AVS usage with ZFS... See demo here:
well, we had some problems with si3124 driver, but with driver binary
posted in this forum the problem seems been fixed. Later we saw the same
fix went in into b72.
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 05:11 +0300, Jonathan Stewart wrote:
Jeff Bonwick wrote:
The Silicon Image 3114 controller is known to
Hi guys,
new article available explaining details on how enterprise-like upgrades
integrated with Nexenta Core Platform starting from RC2 using ZFS
capabilities and Debian APT:
http://www.nexenta.org/os/TransactionalZFSUpgrades
What is NexentaCP?
NexentaCP is a minimal (core) foundation that
Hi All,
This is the road to NCP 1.0...
Our motto:
Ubuntu makes best Debian Desktop platform - Nexenta makes best Debian
Server/Storage platform.
Some latest Nexenta related news:
1) Official Nexenta Core Platform (NCP) repository now is
http://apt.nexenta.org
2) Unstable APT integrated with
Thank you!
we are working on it. new website is coming, as well as next release of
NCP. Meanwhile, old RC1 could be downloaded from:
http://archive.nexenta.org/releases
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 18:01 -0800, MC wrote:
2) Unstable APT integrated with ON build 79, give it a try!
Excellent
impressive
is there a way to transform Sun package to a synaptic package?
selim
On 6/22/07, Al Hopper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Erast Benson wrote:
New unstable ISO of NexentaCP (Core Platform) available.
http://www.gnusolaris.org/unstable-iso/ncp_beta1-test2
Announcing new direction of Open Source NexentaOS development:
NexentaCP (Nexenta Core Platform).
NexentaCP is Dapper/LTS-based core Operating System Platform distributed
as a single-CD ISO, integrates Installer/ON/NWS/Debian and provides
basis for Network-type installations via main or
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 16:26 -0400, Francois Saint-Jacques wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 11:51:08PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
More details on NexentaCP will be available soon...
Is it based on Alpha7?
Alpha7 is the Desktop-oriented ISO, however they share the same main APT
repository, i.e
Did you measure CPU utilization by any chance during the tests?
Its T2000 and CPU cores are quite slow on this box hence might be a
bottleneck.
just a guess.
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 13:10 -0400, Tony Galway wrote:
I had previously undertaken a benchmark that pits “out of box”
performance of UFS
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 16:22 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello devid,
Tuesday, March 20, 2007, 3:58:27 PM, you wrote:
d Does ZFS have a Data Management API to monitor events on files and
d to store arbitrary attribute information with a file? Any answer on
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 09:29 -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 16:22 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello devid,
Tuesday, March 20, 2007, 3:58:27 PM, you wrote:
d Does ZFS have a Data Management API to monitor events on files and
d
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 20:53 -0600, James Dickens wrote:
On 3/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What issues, if any, are likely to surface with using Solaris
inside vmware as a guest os, if I choose to use ZFS?
works great in vmware server, IO rates suck.
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 10:30 -0800, Akhilesh Mritunjai wrote:
Yuen L. Lee wrote:
opensolaris could be a nice NAS filer. I posted
my question on How to build a NAS box asking for
instructions on how to build a Solaris NAS box.
It looks like everyone is busy. I haven't got any
response
28 matches
Mail list logo
