6, and runs, but it
> is not easy for me to attach a 4k sector disk to one of my OI machines, so
> I haven't confirmed its correctness), or temporarily transplant the spare
> in question to a linux machine (or live system) and use hdparm -I.
>
> Tim
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 24, 20
Any ideas?
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:46 AM, LIC mesh wrote:
> That's what I thought also, but since both prtvtoc and fdisk -G see the
> two disks as the same (and I have not overridden sector size), I am
> confused.
> *
> *
> *iostat -xnE:*
> c16t5000C5002AA08E4Dd0
> 6080060800 00255 252 512
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:01 AM, LIC mesh wrote:
>
>> Yet another weird thing - prtvtoc shows both drives as having the same
>> sector size, etc:
>> root@nas:~# prtvtoc /dev/rdsk/c16t5000C50
:~# fdisk -G /dev/rdsk/c16t5000C5005295F727d0
* Physical geometry for device /dev/rdsk/c16t5000C5005295F727d0
* PCYL NCYL ACYL BCYL NHEAD NSECT SECSIZ
608006080000255 252 512
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:01 AM, LIC mesh wrote:
> Yet another weird th
when you aren't
> there to fiddle with things, which is a bad time to find out it won't work.
>
> Tim
>
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:52 PM, LIC mesh wrote:
>
>> Well this is a new one
>>
>> Illumos/Openindiana let me add a device as a hot spare that
Well this is a new one
Illumos/Openindiana let me add a device as a hot spare that evidently has a
different sector alignment than all of the other drives in the array.
So now I'm at the point that I /need/ a hot spare and it doesn't look like
I have it.
And, worse, the other spares I have a
If we've found one bad disk, what are our options?
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Richard Elling
wrote:
> On Sep 30, 2010, at 2:32 AM, Tuomas Leikola wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Scott Meilicke <
> scott.meili...@craneaerospace.com> wrote:
> > Resliver speed has been beate
Yeah, I'm having a combination of this and the "resilver constantly
restarting" issue.
And nothing to free up space.
It was recommended to me to replace any expanders I had between the HBA and
the drives with extra HBAs, but my array doesn't have expanders.
If your's does, you may want to try th
:51 AM, Lin Ling wrote:
>
> What caused the resilvering to kick off in the first place?
>
> Lin
>
> On Sep 29, 2010, at 8:46 AM, LIC mesh wrote:
>
> It's always running less than an hour.
>
> It usually starts at around 300,000h estimate(at 1m in), goes up to
gt; Are snapshots running (turn them off).
>
> So are there eight disks?
>
>
>
> On 9/29/10 8:46 AM, "LIC mesh" wrote:
>
> It's always running less than an hour.
>
> It usually starts at around 300,000h estimate(at 1m in), goes up to an
> estimate in the
2010 at 11:40 AM, Scott Meilicke <
scott.meili...@craneaerospace.com> wrote:
> Has it been running long? Initially the numbers are *way* off. After a
> while it settles down into something reasonable.
>
> How many disks, and what size, are in your raidz2?
>
> -Scott
>
&
Is there any way to stop a resilver?
We gotta stop this thing - at minimum, completion time is 300,000 hours, and
maximum is in the millions.
Raidz2 array, so it has the redundancy, we just need to get data off.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2010, at 1:46 PM, LIC mesh wrote:
>
> Something else is probably causing the slow I/O. What is the output of
> "iostat -en" ? The best answer is "all balls" (balls == zeros)
>
> Found
What options are there to turn off or reduce the priority of a resilver?
This is on a 400TB iSCSI based zpool (8 LUNs per raidz2 vdev, 4 LUNs per
shelf, 6 drives per LUN - 16 shelves total) - my client has gotten to the
point that they just want to get their data off, but this resilver won't
stop.
14 matches
Mail list logo
