Hi all, I have a test system with a large amount of filesystems which
we take snapshots of and do send/recvs with.
On our test machine, we have 1800+ filesystems and about 5,000
snapshots.The system has 48GB of RAM, and 8 cores (x86). The
filesystem is comprised of 2 regular 1TB in a mirror with a
Hi all, from much of the documentation I've seen, the advice is to set
readonly=on on volumes on the receiving side during send/receive
operations. Is this still a requirement?
I've been trying the send/receive while NOT setting the receiver to
readonly and haven't seen any problems even though we
Agreed, SSD with SandForce controllers are the only way to go. The
controller makes a world of difference.
-Moazam
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Orvar Korvar
> wrote:
>>
>> "Your system drive on a Solaris system generally doesn't see e
I tested the Fusion IO MLC based PCI-e cards on OpenSolaris and found
the performance to be amazing. Hopefully Fusion IO will release
supported drivers for Solaris 11 Express and onwards. The Fusion IO
MLC card was giving me around 500MB/s write performance with O_SYNC.
-Moazam
On Wed, Nov 17, 2
I have this with 36 2TB drives (and 2 separate boot drives).
http://www.colfax-intl.com/jlrid/SpotLight_more_Acc.asp?L=134&S=58&B=2267
It's not exactly the same (it has cons/pros), but it is definitely
less expensive. I'm running b147 on it with an LSI controller.
-Moazam
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at
dy Swearingen
wrote:
> Hi Moazam,
>
> The initial diagnosis is that the LSI controller is reporting bogus
> information. It looks like Roy is using a similar controller.
>
> You might report this problem to LSI, but I will pass this issue
> along to the format folks.
>
>
I'm having the same problem after adding 2 SSD disks to my machine.
The controller is LSI SAS9211-8i PCI Express.
# format
Searching for disks...Arithmetic Exception (core dumped)
# pstack core.format.1016
core 'core.format.1016' of 1016:format
fee62e4a UDiv (4, 0, 8046bf0, 8046910
The following is a good explanation:
http://blogs.sun.com/brendan/entry/test
-Moazam
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:42 AM, besson3c wrote:
> Can somebody kindly clarify as to how Solaris and ZFS makes use of RAM?
>
> I have 4 gig of RAM installed on my Solaris/ZFS box serving a pool of 6
> disks.
Hi all, I have a ZFS question related to COW and scope.
If user A is reading a file while user B is writing to the same file,
when do the changes introduced by user B become visible to everyone?
Is there a block level scope, or file level, or something else?
Thanks!
__
Hi all, I'm trying to accomplish server to server storage replication
in synchronous mode where each server is a Solaris/OpenSolaris machine
with its own local storage.
For Linux, I've been able to achieve what I want with DRBD but I'm
hoping I can find a similar solution on Solaris so that I can
Well, he did say fairly cheap. the ST 3511 is about $18.5k. That's
about the same price for the low-end NetApp FAS250 unit.
-Moazam
On Jan 24, 2007, at 9:40 AM, Richard Elling wrote:
Peter Eriksson wrote:
too much of our future roadmap, suffice it to say that one should
expect
much, much m
Hi all,
I'm thinking of using an Enhance 1U R4 SA eSATA storage device with
my Solaris 10 based Sun X2100 box. Has anyone used this before and
have any experiences you could share? The device starts at about $450.
http://www.enhance-tech.com/products/diskarrays/R4SA.html
Thanks.
-M
__
12 matches
Mail list logo
