?
>
> /PeO
>
> Prabahar Jeyaram skrev 2010-09-11 18:39:
>>> What, if you will use Zpools created with OSOL and Dedup on Solaris 10u9
>>>
>> Not supported. You are on your own, if you encounter any issues.
>>
>> --
>> Prabahar.
>>
>>
>
> What, if you will use Zpools created with OSOL and Dedup on Solaris 10u9
>
Not supported. You are on your own, if you encounter any issues.
--
Prabahar.
On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:23 PM, Hans Foertsch wrote:
> bash-3.00# uname -a
> SunOS testxx10 5.10 Generic_142910-17 i86pc i386 i86pc
>
>
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 09:48:39AM +0100, Ga?tan Lehmann wrote:
>
> Le 4 ao?t 09 ? 20:25, Prabahar Jeyaram a ?crit :
>
> >On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:01:40PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> >>On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Prabahar Jeyaram wrote:
> >>
> >>
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:01:40PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Prabahar Jeyaram wrote:
>
>> You seem to be hitting :
>>
>> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6586537
>>
>> The fix is available in OpenSolaris bu
You seem to be hitting :
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6586537
The fix is available in OpenSolaris build 115 and later not for Solaris 10 yet.
--
Prabahar.
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 10:08:37AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Are there any improvements in the Solaris 1
There is ZFS source tour :
URL : http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/source/
--
Prabahar.
On Dec 14, 2008, at 10:25 PM, kavita wrote:
> Is there a documentation available for zfs source code?
> --
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
>
The reason rfs3_{write|create} waiting longer in txg_wait_open is because
there is a syncing txg taking longer to complete.
You may want to trace and track the syncing txg to get the reason for the
delay.
--
Prabahar.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 05:51:44PM -0800, Amer Ather wrote:
> IHAC who is seei
'zfs list' by default does not list the snapshots.
You need to use '-t snapshot' option with "zfs list" to view the snapshots.
--
Prabahar.
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 12:14:47AM +0100, Pawel Tecza wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> This is my zfs list:
>
> # zfs list
> NAME USED AVAIL
The fix is already in Solaris 10 U6. A patch for S10U5 will only be
available when S10U6 is released.
--
Prabahar.
Veltror wrote:
> Is there any possibility that the psarc 2007/567 can be made as a patch to
> Soalris 10 U5. We are planning to dispose of Veritas as quickly as possible
> but sin
The write throttling improvement is in build 87.
--
Prabahar.
Lori Alt wrote:
> Actually, I only meant that zfs boot was integrated
> into build 90. I don't know about the improved
> write throttling.
>
> I will check into why there was no mention of this
> on the "heads up" page.
>
> Lori
>
> A
Hi Max,
You might be hitting the BUG 6513209 (Contributer to the 'zpool import'
delay). There is going to be an official patch soon. Currently it is in
T-Patch state.
You should be able to get the T-Patch through your support channel.
--
Prabahar.
Max Holm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a 3-node(
:
> Thanks for the information.
>
> How does the temporary patch 127729-07 relate to the IDR127787 (x86) which
> I believe also claims to fix this panic?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:32:03PM -0800, Prabahar Jeyaram wrote:
>> The patches (127728-06 : spar
The patches (127728-06 : sparc, 127729-07 : x86) which has the fix for
this panic is in temporary state and will be released via SunSolve soon.
Please contact your support channel to get these patches.
--
Prabahar.
Stuart Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 06:28:31PM -0800, Stuart Anders
Your system seems to have hit the BUG 6458218 :
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6458218
It is fixed in snv_60. As far ZFS, snv_43 is quite old.
--
Prabahar.
On Jan 12, 2008, at 11:15 PM, Ben Rockwood wrote:
> Today, suddenly, without any apparent reason that I can find, I'm
> ge
Nope. It is not there in S10U4.
--
Prabahar.
On Oct 24, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Matthew C Aycock wrote:
> There was a log of talk about ZFS and NFS shares being a problem
> when there was a large number of filesystems. There was a fix that
> in part included an in kernel sharetab (I think :) Does
eply. Can you explain more about this bug ?
>
> Regards
> Masthan D
>
> Prabahar Jeyaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your system seem to have hit a variant of BUG :
>
> 6458218 - http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6458218
>
> This is fixed in Ope
Your system seem to have hit a variant of BUG :
6458218 - http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6458218
This is fixed in Opensolaris Build 60 or S10U4.
--
Prabahar.
On Oct 8, 2007, at 10:04 PM, dudekula mastan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Any one has any chance to look into this issue ?
>
>
Nope. This feature hasn't made it to S10U4. We are anticipating it to be
available in S10U5.
--
Prabahar.
Scott wrote:
> Did the ZFS gzip compression feature (i.e. "zfs set compression=gzip") make
> it in to Solaris 10 U4? I was looking forward to being able to use it in a
> production Solaris
Yep. Just installing the patch would get you all the U4 ZFS updates.
--
Prabahar.
On Sep 19, 2007, at 7:25 AM, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
> Does simply installing that patch on a U3 machine get you all of
> the U4
> zfs updates, or must a full OS upgrade be done?
>
> -Brian
>
>
> George Wilson wro
Attached is the list of ZFS improvements / bugs fixes in S10U4.
--
Prabahar.
4894692 caching data in heap inflates crash dump
6269805 properties should be set via an nvlist.
6276925 option to sort 'zfs list' output
6281585 user defined properties
6341569 zio_alloc_blk() vdev distribution performs
'zpool history' is the 4th feature of ZFS in S10. You should get it
in S10U4.
--
Prabahar.
On Sep 17, 2007, at 8:01 PM, sunnie wrote:
> my system is currently running ZFS versionnn 3.
> And I just can't find the zpool history command.
> can anyone help me with the problem?
>
>
> This message p
This system exhibits the symptoms of :
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6495013
Moving to nevada would certainly help as it has many more bug fixes and
performance improvements over S10U3.
--
Prabahar.
?ukasz wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm investigating problem with ZFS ove
Indeed. ZFS is included in Solaris 10 U2.
-- Prabahar.
Shannon Roddy wrote:
>>>
Solaris 10u2 was released today. You can now download it from here:
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/get.jsp
>
> Does anyone know if ZFS is included in this release? One of my local
> Sun
Yep. ZFS supports the ioctl (_FIOFFS) which 'lockfs -f' issues.
-- Prabahar.
Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
>> On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 13:01, Roch wrote:
>>> Is there a sync command that targets individual FS ?
>>
>> Yes. lockfs -f
>
> Does lockfs work with ZFS ? The man page
24 matches
Mail list logo
