Re: [zfs-discuss] recovering from zfs destroy -r

2011-06-27 Thread Przemyslaw Ceglowski
Those were backups. What about http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_forensics_scrollback_script? http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_forensics_scrollback_script? I am willing to give it a go. Thanks, P On 27 Jun 2011, at 09:32, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk

[zfs-discuss] recovering from zfs destroy -r

2011-06-26 Thread Przemyslaw Ceglowski
Hi, Is there a simple way of rolling back to a specific TXG of a volume to recover from such a situation? Many thanks, Przem ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] OCZ Vertex 2 Pro performance numbers

2010-06-25 Thread Przemyslaw Ceglowski
On 25 Jun 2010, at 15:23, Thomas Burgess wonsl...@gmail.commailto:wonsl...@gmail.com wrote: Conclusion: This device will make an excellent slog device. I'll order them today ;) I have one and i love it...I sliced it though, used 9 gb for ZIL and the rest for L2ARC (my server is on a smallish

Re: [zfs-discuss] High-Performance ZFS (2000MB/s+)

2010-06-15 Thread Przemyslaw Ceglowski
On 15/06/2010 12:42, Arve Paalsrud arve.paals...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We are currently building a storage box based on OpenSolaris/Nexenta using ZFS. Our hardware specifications are as follows: Quad AMD G34 12-core 2.3 GHz (~110 GHz) 10 Crucial RealSSD (6Gb/s) 42 WD RAID Ed. 4 2TB

Re: [zfs-discuss] SSDs adequate ZIL devices?

2010-06-15 Thread Przemyslaw Ceglowski
On 15/06/2010 23:46, Christopher George cgeo...@ddrdrive.com wrote: So why buy SSD for ZIL at all? For the record, not all SSDs ignore cache flushes. There are at least two SSDs sold today that guarantee synchronous write semantics; the Sun/Oracle LogZilla and the DDRdrive X1. Also, I

[zfs-discuss] iscsitgtd failed request to share on zpool import after upgrade from b104 to b134

2010-05-04 Thread Przemyslaw Ceglowski
Hi, I am posting my question to both storage-discuss and zfs-discuss as I am not quite sure what is causing the messages I am receiving. I have recently migrated my zfs volume from b104 to b134 and upgraded it from zfs version 14 to 22. It consist of two zvol's 'vol01/zvol01' and

Re: [zfs-discuss] [storage-discuss] iscsitgtd failed request to share on zpool import after upgrade from b104 to b134

2010-05-04 Thread Przemyslaw Ceglowski
: 04 May 2010 13:14 To: Przemyslaw Ceglowski Subject: Re: [storage-discuss] iscsitgtd failed request to share on zpool import after upgrade from b104 to b134 Look and see if the target daemon service is still enabled. COMSTAR has been the official scsi target project for a while now. In fact

Re: [zfs-discuss] [storage-discuss] iscsitgtd failed request to share on zpool import after upgrade from b104 to b134

2010-05-04 Thread Przemyslaw Ceglowski
On May 4, 2010, at 2:43 PM, Richard Elling wrote: On May 4, 2010, at 5:19 AM, Przemyslaw Ceglowski wrote: It does not look like it is: r...@san01a:/export/home/admin# svcs -a | grep iscsi online May_01 svc:/network/iscsi/initiator:default online May_01 svc:/network/iscsi

Re: [zfs-discuss] [storage-discuss] iscsitgtd failed request to share on zpool import after upgrade from b104 to b134

2010-05-04 Thread Przemyslaw Ceglowski
Jim, On May 4, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Jim Dunham wrote: On May 4, 2010, at 2:43 PM, Richard Elling wrote: On May 4, 2010, at 5:19 AM, Przemyslaw Ceglowski wrote: It does not look like it is: r...@san01a:/export/home/admin# svcs -a | grep iscsi online May_01 svc:/network

Re: [zfs-discuss] [storage-discuss] iscsitgtd failed request to share on zpool import after upgrade from b104 to b134

2010-05-04 Thread Przemyslaw Ceglowski
Ceglowski prze...@ceglowski.netmailto:prze...@ceglowski.net Jim, On May 4, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Jim Dunham wrote: On May 4, 2010, at 2:43 PM, Richard Elling wrote: On May 4, 2010, at 5:19 AM, Przemyslaw Ceglowski wrote: It does not look like it is: r...@san01a:/export/home/admin