[zfs-discuss] ZFS vs FAT

Can u site the differences b/w ZFS and FAT filesystems?? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

[zfs-discuss] help me....

hi can you give some disadvantages of the ZFS file system?? plzz its urgent... help me. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] Inherited quota question

Has there been any solution to the problem discussed above in ZFS version 8?? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] Inherited quota question

Hi everyone, I have been following this thread and I feel that this has been resolved in the ZFS version 8, which is done as follows, bash-3.00# zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT tank 266K 263G 32.0K /tank tank/bm 28.8K 5.00G 28.8K /tank/bm tank/

[zfs-discuss] zfs create -p only creates the parent but not the child

I have a pool "tank" and "dir1" is the filesystem on that pool. "zfs list" and "df -h" both shows "tank/dir1" mounted. *-* *# zfs list* *tank 124K 228G32K /tank* *tank/dir1 31K 228G31K /tank/dir1* *#* *

[zfs-discuss] Question regarding incremental zfs send/recv for hundreds of zfs filesystems under one pool

starting the incremental one. In our case file systems are getting created on the fly while incremental send/recv is active in parallel. Thanks in advance, --Rahul ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs create -p only creates the parent but not the child

1 229G 34K 229G 1% /tank/dir1* * tank/dir1/dir2/dir3 229G 31K 229G 1% /tank/dir1/dir2/dir3* * #* On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Richard Elling wrote: > comment below... > > On Jan 24, 2011, at 1:58 PM, Rahul Deb wrote: > > I have a pool "tank&quo

Re: [zfs-discuss] Question regarding incremental zfs send/recv for hundreds of zfs filesystems under one pool

created filesystems under that pool. So incremental send/recv will not work. On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Ian Collins wrote: > On 01/25/11 12:30 PM, Rahul Deb wrote: > > There is only one pool and hundreds of zfs file systems under that > pool. New file systems are getting create

[zfs-discuss] Question regarding "zfs snapshot -r"

s includes the new file system created within that 10 seconds? OR it will exclude that newly created filesystem? Thanks, -- Rahul ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] Question regarding "zfs snapshot -r" and also regarding "zfs send -R"

y(one after another) ? I am asking this because, if it sends serially, send/recv will take long time to finish based on the number of snapshots need to be send and this duration will gradually increase if number of snapshots also keep increasing. Is my assumption correct? Thanks, -- Rahul On Tue, Feb

[zfs-discuss] Concurrent zfs send/recv for 100 file systems

time for send/recv operation to the second system. Thanks, -- Rahul ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] Concurrent zfs send/recv for 100 file systems

Sorry, I forgot to mention. This is for Incremental Snapshots On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Rahul Deb wrote: > Hi All, > > I have two text files: > > 1. *snap_prev.txt:* This one lists the name of the immediate previous > snapshots of the 100 zfs file systems. O